The word 'nominative' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a linguistic form that is used for a subject of an active sentence or a predicate nominative. For example: "The nominative form of the verb 'runs' is 'run'."
The nominal and pronominal declension had seven cases: nominative, genitive, dative, accusative, ablative, instrumental, and locative.
In the phrase "It was he," "it" and "he" are the same thing: they're both the subject, and thus nominative.
As he knows, the nominative and accusative cases are the reason that we don't say gibberish like "Her gave it to he and then sat by we here!" No idea is more basic to English syntax and grammar.
In other words, in the absence of any reason to use the nominative, the accusative is natural:Who ate the last piece of cake?
So if the subject of the sentence It was he is nominative, so should the pronoun in the predicate be: it = he.
It is akin to the German (Das bin ich, which is the equivalent of what English speakers used to say: It am I, with both pronouns in the nominative case).
In the dual, the cases that were semantically close to each other were represented by a single form (nominative-accusative-vocative, instrumental-dative, genitive-locative).
The case-marking pattern is nominative-accusative, with experiencer subjects taking the dative inflection.
Every noun has an oblique stem in the singular and plural that is formed by the addition of a suffix (derived from Proto-Dravidian *i, *a, *tt, or *n or a combination of these, in addition to a zero suffix ) to which non-nominative case markers are added.
Objective Case is assumed to be assigned to any NP in direct object position, e.g., my pass in (T1), and Nominative Case is assigned to an NP in the subject position of a tensed clause, e.g., the guard in (T1).) He also makes two specific assumptions about the derivation of passive clauses.
(The subject position is the obvious one, because there it will receive Nominative Case).
