nominated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "nominated with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to express that someone has been nominated alongside others or for a specific award. Example: "She was nominated with several other candidates for the prestigious award."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

44 human-written examples

At the 48th Annual Grammy Awards, The Game was nominated with a total of two nominations, including Grammy Award for Best Rap Song and Grammy Award for Best Rap Performance by a Duo or Group for the smash single "Hate It or Love It".

Wikipedia

"Win or lose it's just great and cool to be nominated with that group".

The New York Times - Arts

"To be nominated with the other finalists is one of the proudest moments of my life," said Conolan.

The Guardian

A titan of an older generation is also nominated with Peter Porter, 80, a previous winner, shortlisted for his 18th collection Better Than God.

The Guardian - Books

"She was so pleased to be nominated with him she sent him a beautiful gift basket – with a timer," Baldwin said.

The Guardian - Film

Startlingly, the lyricist Fred Ebb, nominated with composer John Kander for the Broadway premiere of their musical The Visit, has been dead for 11 years.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

13 human-written examples

Nominations will be declared on Friday and there are always candidates who nominate with no public fanfare.

The Guardian

For example, the duty to commission officers of the United States is enjoined by the constitution and he must nominate with the advice and consent of the Senate.

Wikipedia

I was nominated for " — — — — — — With the Hat".

The New York Times - Magazine

Disaffected Democrats, largely Southerners, then nominated Breckinridge, with Sen. Joseph Lane of Oregon as his running mate.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Worthy was one of three former University of North Carolina players nominated, along with Bobby Jones and Bob McAdoo.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, substitute "with" in the phrase "nominated with" for alternatives like "alongside" or "together with". This enhances grammatical precision and avoids potential ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "nominated with" to connect a person or entity to a nomination. Instead, use "nominated alongside" or "nominated together with" to accurately convey the intended meaning and prevent grammatical errors.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "nominated with" functions as part of a verb phrase describing someone's nomination status in relation to another person or entity. However, according to Ludwig AI, this construction is not grammatically sound, suggesting alternative phrasing for better clarity.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Wiki

20%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "nominated with" appears in various contexts like news, encyclopedias, and scientific texts, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The primary issue stems from the need for clearer, more precise language when indicating that a nomination is shared or connected with others. Better alternatives include "nominated alongside" or "nominated together with", which enhance clarity and avoid potential misinterpretations. When writing, aim for these alternatives to improve the grammatical accuracy and overall quality of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

nominated alongside

Replaces "with" with "alongside" to clearly indicate being nominated together with others.

nominated together with

Uses "together with" to explicitly state the joint nomination.

nominated in conjunction with

Replaces "with" with "in conjunction with" for a more formal tone.

nominated alongside others

Adds "others" to emphasize that the nomination is shared among multiple people.

received a nomination with

Rephrases to focus on receiving a nomination and include additional details.

was also nominated for

Focuses on the additional nomination and the specific category.

nominated in partnership with

Highlights the partnership aspect of the nomination.

nominated in collaboration with

Emphasizes the collaborative nature of the nomination.

nominated with the support of

Indicates that the nomination was influenced or backed by a group or individual.

nominated by

Focuses on the body or person who made the nomination.

FAQs

How can I properly use the phrase "nominated with" in a sentence?

While "nominated with" is often used, it is not grammatically correct. Instead, use phrases like "nominated alongside" or "nominated together with" for better clarity and grammatical correctness.

What are some alternatives to "nominated with" that I can use?

Several alternatives to "nominated with" include "nominated alongside", "nominated together with", or "nominated in conjunction with", each providing a more grammatically sound way to express the same idea.

Is it correct to say "nominated with" or should I use another phrase?

It's generally better to avoid "nominated with" as it is considered grammatically incorrect. Opt for phrases like "nominated alongside" or "nominated together with" for improved accuracy.

What's the difference between using "nominated with" and "nominated alongside"?

"Nominated with" is often seen as grammatically questionable. "Nominated alongside" clearly indicates that someone is nominated in the company of others, making it a more precise and grammatically correct choice.