Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
The sausages are a nominally seasoned plain pork (the correct banger for breakfast), the bacon is excellent, the fried egg bright and fresh.
Of the 420 DMRs originally identified as significant below a nominal p-value of 0.05, 33% were identified as nominally significant in the CETS model corrected data.
Our results, although nominally significant, were not significant after correcting for multiple comparisons.
Also, age-at-prodrome (median, range for LIP: 19, 12 66, for HIP: 23, 2 47, p=0.054) and age-of-onset (LIP: 23, 15 67, HIP: 27, 8 55, p=0.0079) were only close to or nominally significant, i.e. above the Bonferroni corrected significance threshold (p>0.005).
Neither of the nominally significant associations (p < 0.05) remained significant after correcting for multiple comparisons (p < 0.0056).
Across all NIs and all diets, few categories were even nominally significant for enrichment and none was significant after correcting for multiple testing (Table 4).
We found that SNP rs4599 was significantly associated with REE (the conservative Bonferroni corrected significance threshold is P = 0.0038) and nominally associated with fasting glucose levels and sleep duration (Table 3).
After correcting for weight gain due to water absorption, the nominally cross-linked liners demonstrated mean wear rates of 15.7 (±1.7) and 12.5 (±1.0) mg/million cycles.
A 6-inch-thick membrane mirror was built and electrostatic pressure was used to pull the nominally flat mirror to a 32 m radius of curvature and to adaptively correct its aberrations.
For the APD traits, only the DRD2 TaqID SNP showed a nominally significant association (p = 0.046) which did not remain significant after correcting for multiple comparisons.
Significant enrichment is highlighted in bold and the p-value corrected for genomic location of genes is shown in parenthesis after nominally significant enrichments.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com