Exact(5)
A qualitative independent variable is a variable that has unquantifiable, nominal variants (levels), which represent different categories such as the fish gender.
In total, only three of the 19 Y-STR nominal variants were SNP variants.
Of the last two nominal variants, rs4769524 at 13q12.13, is located upstream of the G Protein- Coupled Receptor 12 (gene2) gene and rs1382566 at 8p23.1, is located within an intron of the B Lymphoid Tyrosine Kinase (BLK) gene.
These nominal variants were found in loci DYS389I/II, DYS390, DYS393, DYS481, DYS518, and DYS635, and have been further characterized as either SNP variants or repeat pattern variants (RPVs) (Table 1).
Of the other two nominal variants, rs1785581 at 18q11.2 is immediately downstream of the TAF4b RNA Polymerase II, TATA Box Binding Protein (TBP)- Associated Factor (TAF4B) gene, and was associated with increases of 10.7 ± 3.6 and 6.8 ± 1.3 follicles for the TT and CT genotypes, respectively.
Similar(55)
In this study, nominal variant sequences were classified as SNP variants if they displayed a repeat motif that differs from the commonly-described motif, an occurrence indicative of point substitution.
However, if another nominal variant was detected for this allele with a repeat motif of [TCTA]6[TCTG]11, it would be labeled a RPV, as the structure remains consistent with the reported repeat motif but displays a pattern of repeat units that has not been previously documented.
We developed a novel bioinformatics approach to identify the nominal genetic variants associated with complex diseases.
These sequences may be divided into 2 categories: nominal allele variant sequences and novel allele sequences.
Of the 37 previously-undocumented allele sequences that were detected, 19 were classified as nominal allele variant sequences.
If a "17" allele was detected with a repeat motif of [TCTA]5 [TATA] 1[TCTG]11, this nominal allele variant sequence would likely be due to the presence of a C/A SNP in the first "TCTA" repeat unit.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com