The phrase "nominal items" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to items or expenses that are relatively small or insignificant in amount. It can be used in various contexts, such as financial reports, budget plans, or shopping lists. Example sentence: The financial report included a breakdown of all expenses, both large and small, but it was important for the team to review the nominal items in order to cut costs.
Lines 2, 4 and 7 use nominal items that are not referentially new to the context – the repeated but Presenting pocket in 2, the presuming boarding cards in 4 and the presuming pronominal deictic those in 7 – as New information since they carry the tonic foot.
Nine items of the 29 nominal items were about information.
Therefore, we did not include 29 nominal items measuring quality aspects.
Chi-square tests were used to test the correlation between nominal items and by analysis of variance differences between group means were tested.
Although grammatical class is problematic as a norming measure, because many words can be read as either verbs or nouns (e.g., call, run, telephone), concreteness can be used as a measure of the intrinsic S properties of the item, which may include both the verbal and nominal uses of items.
Because we were interested in whether the ratings were similar, we present the percentage agreement of all nominal and ordinal items.
Those who are eligible for the GMS scheme (medical card holders) are entitled to free prescription drugs and appliances with a nominal charge per item (€0.50) introduced in budget 2011.
Significant differences between physicians and nurses were found for four nominal and one numeric item among 17 items suitable for comparison out of the 20 survey items.
The American Medical Association said drug companies should not be forbidden to give doctors pens, notepads and other items of nominal value that have "no correlation to any service provided by the physician to the pharmaceutical company".
Responding to critics of the statute, who have complained that providing a cup of coffee or a company baseball cap could be regarded as a bribe, the guide reassuringly states that "it is difficult to envision any scenario in which the provision of cups of coffee, taxi fare or company promotional items of nominal value would ever evidence corrupt intent".
It contained a combination of nominal, ordinal, and scale items.
