Suggestions(1)
Exact(5)
The Poisson distribution only describes how the nodes are statistically distributed, not how they move.
On the other hand, by monotonicity of mapping f ^ : P ^ ( k | k - 1 ) → P ^ ( k + 1 | k ), it follows that P ( k | k - 1 ) ≥ P 0 ( k | k - 1 ) → P, where P 0 ( k | k - 1 ) is the covariance for P(0| - 1) = 0. Hence, P k|k - 1) → P. aThe assumption here is that at the beginning of the consensus update process, the filtered estimates at different nodes are statistically uncorre-lated.
Presence of extracapsular extension and an increased number of positive nodes are statistically significantly negative prognostic factors for OS.
However, the ML tree (summarized in Figure 4) and several topologies with alternative branching patterns among at the basal-most nodes are statistically indistinguishable under maximum likelihood (Table 4).
Posterior probabilities (PP) for a vast majority of nodes are statistically significant (≥ 0.95) and the clades with probabilities less than 0.90 are relationships between populations of subspecies (Fig. 2).
Similar(55)
Since the fading path from two nodes is statistically independent, spatial diversity is achieved [13].
Here each pair of nodes is statistically evaluated which is explained in Appendix, and the results are stored into a 2D array.
The difference between the rates of tumor-positive radioactive and blue lymph nodes was statistically significant (p = 0.004).
The Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree is shown in Fig. 2. Most basal nodes were statistically well supported whereas some more recent splits were poorly resolved.
The correlation between the amount of TACE mRNA and the presence of metastases in regional lymph nodes was statistically significant (P=0.009).
The precision of search orderings of Ecdysozoa and Opisthokont nodes was statistically higher than the precision of the corresponding single-species search nodes (see Additional file 2, Supplemental Figure 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com