Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
In undetection, the CH does not detects a node as abnormal when the node is really jammed (that is, the CH does not detect the jammed node or CH fails to detect a jammed node) (Section 4.3).
An image of an entire lymph node section consists of hundreds of 200×, high-resolution sub-images, depending on the size of the tissue section.
In order to determine the range of interpoint distances to be analyzed in the L function analyses, we computed a distance matrix using 500 B cells that were randomly selected from a lymph node section.
As a reference target distribution, we generated the L function from T cell data, which are the locations of all T cells identified in a particular lymph node section.
Histological analysis of mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) showed a trend towards increased numbers of lymphoid follicles (non-immunized mice: 6±2.31; immunized mice: 11.75±1.44 follicles/lymph node section, p = 0.11; Supplemental Figure S2A).
All 200× images that composed an entire lymph node section were then analyzed using a custom image analysis software, GemIdent, yielding the total number of cells for each stained phenotype and the location (x, y coordinate) of each cell identified [5].
Similar(47)
CD4+ staining was confirmed in human lymph node sections (Supplementary Fig. S3).
So in my model I'd put an ExpSyn with those parameters on one of the node sections and use a NetStim instead of IClamp?
The node sections and the internode sections have their appropriate properties (former are short, cm = 1 uf/cm2 or thereabouts, and have gna and gk and maybe leak; latter are long, cm much smaller, and have no ion channels).
The node sections and the internode sections have their appropriate properties (former are short, cm = 1 uf/cm2 or theredabouts, and have gna and gk and maybe leak; latter are long, cm much smaller, and have no ion channels).
Most of the metastases analyzed were peritoneal dissemination, whereas few corresponded to lymph node sections.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com