nobody of

USAGE SUMMARY

"nobody of" is not a grammatically correct phrase in written English.
It is possible that it could be used in spoken language in a certain context, but it would not be considered standard or formal English. Example: "Nobody of sound mind would agree to such a ridiculous proposal." This sentence could be rephrased as "No one in their right mind would agree to such a ridiculous proposal" to sound more natural and correct in written English.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Nobody of course".

The New York Times

Nobody, of course, has yet seen Simon Cowell weep.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Nobody, of course, could push on like Bob did.

The New Yorker

Still, nobody of sound mind is writing him off.

The Guardian - Sport

Surely nobody of sound mind actually takes it seriously?

The Guardian - TV & Radio

They said nobody of any substance would live in a tenement but Saml.

The New Yorker

There is nobody of that calibre chasing them down and they don't look like stopping.

Independent

Certainly there had been nobody of either gender making thematic and formal work like Boty's.

The Guardian - Books

Nobody, of course, had done this before; Björk tends to do things first.

The Guardian - Music

His words and explanations convinced nobody of his innocence in the matter.

The New York Times - Sports

Petra Fried, head of drama, Clarkenwell Films (Persuasion, Diary of a Nobody) Of course critics matter.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "nobody of" in formal writing. Instead, opt for grammatically correct alternatives such as "no one of" or "none of".

Common error

The phrase "nobody of" is often used incorrectly when the intended meaning is to indicate that no one within a specific group or category possesses a certain attribute. To correct this, use 'no one of' or 'none of' followed by a noun or pronoun to clearly specify the group you're referring to.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "nobody of" is generally considered ungrammatical in standard English. It is intended to function as a determiner phrase, modifying a noun to indicate the absence of any individuals from a specified group or category. The provided examples, as noted by Ludwig AI, showcase its use in various contexts, though often incorrectly.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "nobody of" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI's analysis highlights its absence in authoritative sources and recommends using alternatives like "no one of" or "none of". While it may occasionally appear in informal speech, it should be avoided in formal writing to maintain linguistic accuracy. Given its lack of consistent and correct usage, it's best to opt for grammatically sound alternatives to effectively convey the intended meaning of absence or lack of individuals within a group.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no one of

Similar meaning, replacing "nobody" with "no one" for a slightly different emphasis.

none of

A more concise alternative indicating the absence of individuals within a group.

not one of

Emphasizes the lack of even a single person or entity from a group.

no person of

A more formal and direct alternative, focusing on the absence of a person.

no individual of

Similar to "no person of", but emphasizes individuality.

without a single

Expresses the complete absence of something or someone.

not any of

Indicates the lack of any members within a group.

not a soul of

A more emphatic way of saying that no one within a group is present or involved.

zero of

A direct and quantitative way to state that none exist.

lacking any

Focuses on the absence of something needed or expected.

FAQs

What are some correct alternatives to "nobody of"?

Instead of "nobody of", you can use phrases like "no one of", "none of", or "not one of", depending on the context.

Is "nobody of" grammatically correct?

No, "nobody of" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use alternatives like "no one of" or "none of".

How can I avoid using "nobody of" in my writing?

When you intend to express that no person from a certain group has a specific characteristic, rephrase your sentence using "no person of", "not a single person of" or a similar construction.

What's the difference between "nobody of" and "none of"?

"Nobody of" is generally considered ungrammatical, whereas "none of" is a correct and widely accepted phrase used to indicate that not any of a group possesses a certain attribute.