no uses

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no uses" is not correct in standard written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that there are no applications or functions for something. Example: "In this context, there are no uses for the outdated software."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

It is possible that NO uses various mechanisms to escape RBC, reach vascular endothelium, and exert its vasodilatory effect.

CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology

And slap in the middle is an office where people can go to debate the usefulness of all this art – art, of course, supposedly having no uses.

The Guardian - Arts

Roentgenium has no uses whatsoever.

The Guardian

Due to its instability, this element has no uses.

The Guardian

This element, which has no uses whatsoever, has received scant attention since then.

The Guardian

As it nears the sea, though, the opportunities diminish to the point where it has no uses except to sustain deltas, wetlands and the estuarial ecology, and to carry silt out to sea.These should not be overlooked.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Yuck! Do no use real mud.

WikiHow

There's no use in it.

WikiHow

No use.

The New York Times

But no use waiting.

The New York Times

There is no use".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for formal or academic writing, prefer alternatives like "no applications" or "serves no purpose" over "no uses" to maintain clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "uses" as a plural noun when a more specific term like "applications", "functions", or "purposes" would provide greater clarity and precision in your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no uses" functions as a determiner phrase, indicating the absence of applications or functions. Despite its frequent appearance across varied contexts, Ludwig AI suggests that the phrase is not considered standard English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

33%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "no uses" is relatively common, it's crucial to understand its grammatical limitations. Ludwig AI identifies it as not entirely correct in standard written English. Its function is to express a lack of applications or purposes. For formal writing, consider alternatives such as "no applications", ""no purpose"", or "serves no purpose" to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy. The phrase appears across various contexts, including news, science, and wiki sources, indicating its broad but potentially informal usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no applications

Focuses on the lack of specific purposes or tasks for which something is suitable.

no purpose

Emphasizes the absence of a reason or intention for something's existence or action.

not in use

Highlights the state of something being inactive or unemployed at a given time.

no function

Stresses the absence of a specific role or operation that something is designed to perform.

serves no purpose

Indicates that something does not contribute to any goal or aim.

has no utility

Implies that something lacks usefulness or practical value.

is not useful

States directly that something does not provide benefit or assistance.

cannot be used

Focuses on the inability or impossibility of employing something for a particular task.

is unusable

Highlights that something is not in a condition to be used or applied.

without any use

Emphasizes the condition of something lacking any form of employment or application.

FAQs

How can I use "no uses" in a sentence?

While grammatically questionable, you can use "no uses" to indicate that something has no applications or functions. However, consider alternatives for clarity.

What can I say instead of "no uses"?

You can use alternatives like "no applications", "no purpose", or "no function" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "no uses" or "no use"?

"No use" is generally the more grammatically sound option in most contexts, particularly when expressing futility or lack of benefit. "No uses" can be employed to indicate a lack of applications, but it's less common.

What's the difference between "no uses" and "no applications"?

"No uses" implies a general lack of ways to employ something, while "no applications" specifically refers to the absence of practical uses or tasks for which something is suitable.