no surprisingly

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no surprisingly" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an attempt to express that something is not surprising, but the construction is awkward and incorrect. Example: "No surprisingly, the results were as expected."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

And, no, surprisingly enough Marrakech is not "over"... not yet!

Huffington Post

No surprisingly, the more computation availability, and the more AZ requests performed in-house instead turned to the public zone, the higher the revenues.

BioMed Research International

He's cute, no? Surprisingly.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

He's no longer surprisingly hostile; now he's surprisingly benevolent.

The New Yorker

But on this sunny day we had it, no longer surprisingly, all to ourselves.

The New York Times - Travel

No too surprisingly, it quickly became a cult classic.

Huffington Post

Surprisingly, no.

The Economist

There is a pause before he answers, surprisingly, "No".

The New Yorker

And the answer is surprisingly no.

Huffington Post

Surprisingly, no, say air pollution regulators.

Environmental Health Perspectives

No less surprisingly, Iraq's output is rising, too.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "no surprisingly" in formal or academic writing. Use "unsurprisingly" or "not surprisingly" instead to maintain grammatical correctness.

Common error

Be careful with adverb placement. "No surprisingly" incorrectly modifies the sentence. Instead, use adverbs like "unsurprisingly" or "not surprisingly" at the beginning of the sentence, followed by a comma.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no surprisingly" attempts to function as an adverbial phrase, aiming to modify a sentence by expressing a lack of surprise. However, it's grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is not correct.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no surprisingly" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase is not correct English. While the intent is to convey a lack of surprise, better alternatives such as "unsurprisingly" or "not surprisingly" are recommended. These alternatives are grammatically sound and maintain the intended meaning. Though found in some news and scientific sources, its incorrect structure diminishes its suitability for professional or academic use. Remember to prioritize grammatical accuracy to ensure clear and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Unsurprisingly

Single word adverb that means the same, but it is grammatically correct.

Not surprisingly

A grammatically correct alternative to express something is expected.

Predictably

Single word adverb indicating that something happened as expected.

As expected

Expresses the idea that something happened in accordance with expectations.

It's not surprising that

A longer phrase emphasizing the lack of surprise about a situation.

It comes as no surprise

Indicates that something is not unexpected.

It was to be expected

Emphasizes that something was predictable or inevitable.

As one might expect

A formal way to indicate something is not surprising, appealing to general expectation.

Hardly surprising

Highlights the lack of surprise, often implying obviousness.

It's hardly a shock

Highlights the lack of surprise, often implying obviousness.

FAQs

What's a better way to say "no surprisingly"?

Use alternatives like "unsurprisingly" or "not surprisingly". These alternatives are grammatically correct and commonly used.

Is "no surprisingly" grammatically correct?

No, "no surprisingly" is not grammatically correct. It's an incorrect use of adverbs. The correct forms are "unsurprisingly" or "not surprisingly".

How do I use "unsurprisingly" in a sentence?

Begin the sentence with "Unsurprisingly", followed by a comma and the rest of the sentence. For example, "Unsurprisingly, the results were as expected."

What is the difference between "no surprisingly" and "not surprisingly"?

"Not surprisingly" is the correct phrase to use in English, while "no surprisingly" is grammatically incorrect. Both intend to convey that something is not unexpected, but the correct construction matters.