Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"no substance" is correct and usable in written English.
It is often used to describe something that has little to no value or credibility. For example, "The candidate's claims had no substance and could not be believed."
Exact(60)
Beneath the words there was, again, no substance.
No substance.
"No substance, no depth.
There's no substance to it".
But they had no substance, he said.
There's no substance here at all.
"There was no substance behind the idea".
We see no substance in this contention.
There's absolutely no substance to them.
Tough rhetoric, big promises — and no substance.
It was sentiment and no substance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com