Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
No significant variation of hardness with depth was shown.
There is no significant variation in FaTIP(b) expression in Cléry (Fig. 3h).
All other comparisons with the control showed no significant variation (p > 0.05).
Dynamic light-scattering experiments showed no significant variation after treatment with H2O2 suggesting the absence of aggregation (Supplementary Fig. 3).
From Fig. 3a, it is clear that there is no significant variation in (111) fraction between the two electrodes.
There was no significant variation in the morphology of any anterior brainstem structures in any of the groups.
There was no significant variation in the film hardness with nitrogen flow rate or preferred orientation.
It is found that the Strouhal number shows no significant variation with shear parameter.
It suggests a variation on the plasma density and no significant variation on the active species.
No significant variation was observed for the bonding strength among SD and control (CK) plywood.
No significant variation (P > 0.05) was observed in spermine levels in pEdaoa transformants.
More suggestions(15)
no significant divergence
no appreciable variation
no significant option
no significant disparity
no substantial variation
no remarkable variation
no significant variability
no significant discrepancy
no significant form
no large variation
no significant variance
no significant swing
no significant substitute
no significant alternation
no significant modification
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com