Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
'no seen' is not correct or usable in written English
The correct phrase would be 'not seen'. You could use it when you want to refer to something or someone that has not been seen or detected. For example: "The missing dog has not been seen in days."
Exact(4)
The current data do not allow us to fully answer the question relating to the likely source of increased NO seen in contracted muscle fibers from old mice.
A drifting smoke, from no seen source, hazes the air.
Table 2 summarizes the basic data of the scenes: the average number of fish in each frame (AN), the total number of trajectories (NT) in each scene and the total number of overlappings with others (NO) seen from each trajectory.
Table 5, the expected number of ANC visits of pregnant women from 9 month pregnancy periods for a seen sign of pregnancy complications is 1.2554 times more likely than the expected number of ANC visits for no seen sign of pregnancy complications while holding all other variables in the model constant.
Similar(55)
"Long time no see".
"Long time no see, Dor".
I no see".
"Long time, no see".
Long time no see!'" He scowls.
No? See, that's my point.
"Long time no see," I say.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com