Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
There were no revisions for stem loosening but 2 stems were revised for fracture — both with a defective cement mantle proximally.
There were no revisions for polyethylene wear, osteolysis or tibial insert dissociation.
There were no revisions for loosening, patella problems, or tibial post fracture.
The Exeter patients had no revisions for aseptic loosening (0%) of the femoral stem.
Most importantly, there were no revisions for mechanical failure or fracture of the polyethylene bearing in either group.
There have been no revisions for aseptic stem loosening, and no stem is considered to be at risk for loosening.
Similar(47)
No revision for aseptic loosening is recorded; one anatomical cementless femoral stem had radiological evidence of definite aseptic loosening.
There was no revision for aseptic loosening or notching.
At 6-years follow-up (range, 5 9), there were no cup revisions for osteolysis or loosening.
There were no reported revisions for instability.
I have no major revisions for this work.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com