Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

no repercussions

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

'no repercussions' is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that there are no following consequences or negative outcomes from a situation. For example, "He accepted the job offer without worry because he was assured there would be no repercussions if he chose to leave after a few months."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

There are no repercussions".

And there are no repercussions.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"There were no repercussions," Gray said.

News & Media

The New Yorker

But I've had no repercussions from it.

"I'm hopeful there will be no repercussions locally.

News & Media

Independent

This is not to say there were no repercussions.

News & Media

The New York Times

Even so there'll be no repercussions for Greg, you fear.

News & Media

The Guardian

And there are no repercussions when you write something wrong.

In Rickey's world, there are no repercussions for zany comments.

"I just hope that there are no repercussions tomorrow".

News & Media

The New York Times

And others can eat enormous excesses of salt with no repercussions whatsoever.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "no repercussions" when you want to emphasize the lack of negative consequences, especially in situations where such consequences might be expected or feared. For example, assuring someone that they can speak freely with "no repercussions" creates a safe environment.

Common error

Avoid using "no repercussions" when there might be some subtle or indirect effects. While direct penalties may be absent, long-term or unforeseen effects could still arise. Ensure you're not overpromising a complete absence of any impact.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no repercussions" primarily functions as a noun phrase, often serving as a complement or object within a sentence. Ludwig AI indicates its grammatical correctness, confirming its role in standard English usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

15%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "no repercussions" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, as confirmed by Ludwig. It serves to assure that a specific action will not lead to any adverse consequences, penalties, or negative impacts. Found most commonly in news and media, it also appears in scientific and general contexts. When using this phrase, be mindful of the potential for subtle or unforeseen effects, even if direct penalties are absent. Alternatives such as "no adverse consequences" or "without penalty" can provide nuance depending on the specific context. With a high expert rating and supported by numerous real-world examples, "no repercussions" is a reliable and effective way to convey the absence of negative outcomes.

FAQs

How can I use "no repercussions" in a sentence?

You can use "no repercussions" to assure someone that their actions will not have any negative consequences. For example, "You can voice your opinion without fear, there will be "no repercussions"".

What are some alternatives to "no repercussions"?

Alternatives to "no repercussions" include "no adverse consequences", "no negative impact", or "with impunity". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "no repercussions"?

Yes, "no repercussions" is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase in English. It means that there are no negative consequences or penalties for an action.

What's the difference between "no repercussions" and "no consequences"?

While similar, "no repercussions" often implies the absence of specifically negative consequences or penalties, whereas "no consequences" is broader and can refer to any type of result, positive or negative.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: