Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

no remarkable

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"no remarkable" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is usually used to modify a noun and means not significant or worthy of attention. Example: The city tour was ordinary, with no remarkable landmarks or sites. In this sentence, "no remarkable" is used to describe the lack of notable or noteworthy landmarks during the city tour.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

And there are no remarkable facial features to be noted.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed no remarkable findings.

There was no remarkable pleomorphism.

She had no remarkable medical history.

Electrocardiography indicated no remarkable ischemic changes.

The blood analysis showed no remarkable changes.

He had no remarkable medical history.

No remarkable improvement was observed after longer contact time.

No remarkable patterns regarding the average path length are observed.

No remarkable complications were found during the healing period.

All the lesions healed with no remarkable complications.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "no remarkable" to objectively describe something that lacks noteworthy features, changes, or improvements. This phrase is especially useful in reports, descriptions, and analyses where impartiality is key.

Common error

While "no remarkable" is appropriate for factual contexts, avoid using it excessively in creative writing. Overuse can make your prose sound bland and uninspired. Consider using more evocative language to describe something as ordinary or unremarkable.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no remarkable" primarily functions as a negative descriptor, modifying nouns to indicate the absence of noteworthy or significant attributes. As Ludwig AI points out, it's grammatically correct and modifies a noun to mean 'not significant or worthy of attention.'

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

88%

News & Media

5%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no remarkable" is grammatically correct and commonly employed to indicate the absence of noteworthy characteristics or significance. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its primary function is to modify nouns, denoting something as unremarkable or ordinary. While versatile, it appears most frequently in scientific and medical contexts, where objectivity is paramount. When using this phrase, remember to consider its potential for overuse in creative writing, where more evocative language might be more effective. The analysis indicates that while "no remarkable" is prevalent and generally well-regarded, alternatives may offer a more nuanced expression depending on the desired tone and emphasis.

FAQs

How can I use "no remarkable" in a sentence?

You can use "no remarkable" to describe something that lacks significant or noteworthy qualities. For example, "The patient had "no remarkable medical history"" or "There were "no remarkable changes" in the data."

What are some alternatives to "no remarkable"?

Alternatives to "no remarkable" include "not noteworthy", "not significant", and "nothing striking". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "no remarkable change" or "no significant change"?

Both "no remarkable change" and "no significant change" are grammatically correct, but "no significant change" may be slightly more common in general usage. The choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey; "remarkable" emphasizes the lack of something noteworthy, while "significant" emphasizes the lack of importance.

What does "no remarkable findings" mean in a medical context?

In a medical context, "no remarkable findings" means that a physical examination, test, or procedure did not reveal any significant or unusual results. It typically indicates that everything appears to be normal or within expected parameters.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: