Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
The federal government has taken no action, saying there is no proof of harm in humans.
Neonicotinoids have been fiercely defended by their manufacturers, who claim there is no proof of harm in field conditions and by farming lobbies who say crop yields could fall without pesticide protection.
Britain's National Health Service agrees: having studied the available research, it finds no proof of harm from turbines.In practice, the way people feel about windmills may have as much to do with financial effects as with physical ones.
The American Chemical Council, which represents companies that make and use BPA, issued a statement saying BPA was safe, praising the health agencies as confirming that there was no proof of harm to people by it, but also saying, "We are disappointed that some of the recommendations are likely to worry consumers and are not well founded".
7 There may be no proof of harm from backup beeper noise, but there is evidence that beepers do not protect life and limb as well as hoped.
Similar(54)
There has been no proof found of harm to human health from bioengineered food.
"I have no proof of the injury.
The Institute of Medicine committee itself criticized aspects of influential Air Force studies as "inaccurate" and "unreasonable," including an apparent attempt to associate a lack of proof of harm with proof of no harm.
Experts often say that a lack of proof of harm is not proof of no harm.
So where's the proof of harm?
The crucial gap in the government's case was in proof of harm to consumers.
Related(20)
no evidence of harm
no indication of harm
no proof of wrongdoing
no proof of competence
no proof of fraud
no proof of benefit
no proof of bin
no sign of harm
no risk of harm
no proof of union
no proof of water
no proof of course
no likelihood of harm
no fear of harm
no proof of misconduct
no suggestion of harm
no proof of unconsciousness
no proof of creditworthiness
no threat of harm
no proof of cause
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com