no obviously

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no obviously" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a combination of "no" and "obviously," but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "There is no obviously correct answer to this question."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

53 human-written examples

She gets a no, obviously.

The Guardian

No! Obviously not, Dan declared.

The New Yorker

Well, no, obviously, but let's pretend to wait and see.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

No: obviously, people with guns kill more people than people without them.

The New Yorker

"No, obviously I don't because I am talking to you on my day off.

Independent

Well, no, obviously, but a few brave souls are lifting their heads above the parapet.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

7 human-written examples

My exact response was a quasi spit-take, "No... obviously".

Huffington Post

No, obviously no one gets rich writing books anymore.

The New Yorker

No, obviously not.

The Guardian - Film

No. Obviously, it was wrong," Vina said.

The New York Times

("5C? No. Obviously. 4C. 4C, for Christ's sake").

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "no obviously" in formal writing. Opt for clearer alternatives like "certainly not" or "of course not".

Common error

Be cautious about combining "no" directly with adverbs of certainty. Although sometimes found in informal speech, in formal situations consider rephrasing to avoid ambiguity. For example, rather than writing, "No obviously, this isn't the solution", it is better to say "Obviously, this isn't the solution" or "Certainly, this isn't the solution".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no obviously" serves as a negative response with an added emphasis on the self-evident nature of the negation. While Ludwig shows examples of its usage, the AI itself indicates that it is not correct in standard written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

35%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no obviously" is used to express a negative response with added emphasis on something being self-evident. However, Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is not considered grammatically correct in standard written English. While examples can be found across various sources, including news media and science publications, it is generally recommended to use clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives, such as "of course not" or "certainly not", particularly in formal contexts. Although frequent, its grammatical status suggests caution in its application.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

of course not

Indicates a negative response that should be self-evident.

certainly not

Emphasizes a strong negative response, similar to 'no', but with more conviction.

definitely not

Strongly negates something, highlighting the lack of any possibility.

absolutely not

An emphatic refusal, suggesting the idea is completely unacceptable.

not at all

Negates a statement or question, implying a complete absence or lack.

by no means

Strongly denies something, conveying that it is not possible or true.

not really

A softer negation, suggesting something is not entirely true or accurate.

not in the slightest

Indicates a complete lack of something, reinforcing a negative statement.

far from it

Emphasizes that something is the opposite of what was suggested.

hardly

Implies that something is unlikely or barely true, suggesting a negative.

FAQs

Is the phrase "no obviously" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "no obviously" is not grammatically correct in standard written English. It's better to use phrases like "of course not" or "certainly not".

What does "no obviously" mean?

The intended meaning is to convey a negative response that is also self-evident or should be clear to the listener. However, it is not a standard or grammatically correct way to express this.

What are some alternatives to "no obviously"?

Better alternatives include "definitely not", "absolutely not", or "of course not". The best choice depends on the context and level of emphasis you want to convey.

When should I avoid using "no obviously"?

Avoid using "no obviously" in formal writing, academic papers, or professional communications. It's generally considered informal and grammatically incorrect. Stick to clearer and more standard alternatives.