no more useful

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no more useful" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form would be "not useful anymore" or "no longer useful." Example: "This old software is no more useful for our current needs."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

He then used a standard Windows art program; the results were prettier, but no more useful.

The New York Times

Comparing Barenboim, 73, with Daniil Trifonov, 25, is no more useful that pitting Prospero against Ariel.

The Guardian - Music

Neither would consumers' preferences change, as land would be no more useful, either.

The Economist

I think that if marriages are sufficiently "toxic," there are no more useful weapons than the children.

The New Yorker

In general, the navigation system is no more useful, and no less distracting, than most of the breed.

The New York Times

Saying a wine goes with "vegetable dishes", as many do, is no more useful than saying it goes with food.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

28 human-written examples

Exhaustive investigation into the entire cyst fluid proteome using mass spectrometry has so far yielded no biomarkers any more useful than the CEA level [ 5, 13].

Clinical Proteomics

These are no more than useful rules of thumb; it has been suggested that in practice these and other such principles reduce themselves to the truism melior lectio potior, "the better reading is to be preferred".

Encyclopedia Britannica

But for Parks and his own pelvic headaches (or mental pelvic aches?), that book is no more than a useful guide away from unsatisfactory medical thinking.

The New York Times - Books

Nevertheless, when there is a consistent signal of HGT between donor and recipient species, it will no doubt prove more useful to concatenate those genes into a single alignment to improve resolution.

Nature

After all, no one is more useful to Wall Street firms than an ex-regulator who can help them avoid getting punished for coming up with new "innovative financial products" that wind up screwing over the poor and middle classes.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clear and grammatically sound writing, consider rephrasing "no more useful" with alternatives like "not useful anymore" or "no longer useful" to ensure correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "no more" followed directly by an adjective like "useful" when you mean something has ceased to be useful. Instead, use "no longer" or "not anymore" to clearly express the change in utility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no more useful" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, aiming to express that something has ceased to be as helpful or effective as it once was. However, as pointed out by Ludwig, this construction is considered grammatically incorrect.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

33%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "no more useful" seeks to convey a decline in utility or effectiveness but is flagged as grammatically incorrect by Ludwig. While it appears in varied sources like News & Media, Science, and Academia, it's essential to opt for grammatically sound alternatives such as "not useful anymore" or "no longer useful" to maintain clarity and credibility. When aiming to express that something has lost its usefulness, choosing grammatically correct structures ensures your message is accurately conveyed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not as effective

Replaces "useful" with "effective", focusing on the degree of impact or result.

not as helpful

Substitutes "useful" with "helpful", highlighting the assistance provided.

less beneficial

Emphasizes the reduced advantages or gains provided.

not so valuable

Replaces "useful" with "valuable", underlining the importance or worth.

not particularly effective

Adds "particularly" to soften the criticism, suggesting a slight lack of effectiveness.

not especially helpful

Uses "especially" to subtly diminish the level of helpfulness.

of limited use

Indicates that the usefulness is restricted or not fully realized.

serves little purpose

Focuses on the lack of a significant reason or function.

doesn't offer much benefit

Highlights the absence of substantial advantages.

practically useless

Emphasizes a near-total lack of practical application or value.

FAQs

How can I properly use the idea of "no more useful" in a sentence?

Rephrase it using alternatives such as "not useful anymore" or "no longer useful".

What's a grammatically sound alternative to "no more useful"?

Consider using phrases like "not as effective", "less beneficial", or "of limited use".

Is there a difference in meaning between "no more useful" and "not useful anymore"?

While they aim to convey a similar idea, "not useful anymore" is grammatically correct and clearly indicates that something's utility has ended, while "no more useful" is considered grammatically incorrect.

Can "no more useful" be considered correct in any context?

Despite its presence in various sources, the phrase "no more useful" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to opt for clearer alternatives like "not useful anymore" or "no longer useful".