no more identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no more identified" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express that something is no longer recognized or acknowledged, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "After the investigation, there were no more identified suspects in the case."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

I no more identified with the community of women and their mothers than I identified with Queen Noor of Jordan -- an American woman about my age who had grown up in the U.S. and then married a Middle-Eastern king.

Huffington Post

Public Health Wales had warned earlier that the number of cases could increase, but it announced on Monday afternoon that there had been no more identified so far.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

He would no more identify himself as a misanthrope or Little Englander than he would stick Steps on his turntable.

The Guardian - Books

We should no more identify the problems of health care reform solely with President Obama than we should identify the financial meltdown of 2008 solely with then-President Bush.

Huffington Post

No filmmaker was more identified with the New York Film Festival's first decade than Jean-Luc Godard; now entering its second half-century with a new programming director, Kent Jones, the festival is poised to begin New York's first comprehensive retrospective devoted to... Jean-Luc Godard.

The New York Times

No name has been more identified with what Princeton stands for than that of Woodrow Wilson.

Huffington Post

Probably no group of animals is more identified with Africa than its Carnivora (the order of flesh-eating mammals), of which there are more than 60 species.

Encyclopedia Britannica

No [Israeli politician] is more identified, or has such a burning desire and severity of belief in the possibility of a peace agreement with the Palestinians, than Tzipi Livni.

The Guardian

And they are more identified with the news brand".

The New York Times

Broadway has become more identified with Disney and Las Vegas than with Stephen Sondheim or David Mamet.

The New York Times

Instead more identified as being with the baby boomers at 34% or the older demographic "Greatest Generation" at 34%.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating that no further items or entities were identified, prefer using "no further identified" or "no additional identified" for clarity. For example, "After the review, no further issues were identified".

Common error

Avoid using "no more identified" when the intended meaning is that something is no longer being identified. It's usually more accurate to say "no longer identified" or "not identified anymore".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no more identified" functions as a modifier, attempting to indicate the absence of further identification. Ludwig AI analysis indicates that the phrase is not grammatically correct. It typically appears in contexts where the intention is to express that something is no longer being identified.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Encyclopedias

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no more identified" is considered grammatically incorrect by Ludwig AI, and its usage is infrequent. While it appears in some news and scientific contexts, it is advisable to use clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives like "no further identified" or "no longer identified". These alternatives ensure better communication and avoid potential confusion. The expert rating reflects the grammatical issues and the availability of better alternatives, despite its presence in authoritative sources.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no further identified

Emphasizes the lack of additional identification, implying a stop to the process.

no longer identified

Indicates that something or someone was previously identified but is not anymore.

not identified any longer

Rephrases the concept of something ceasing to be identified.

no new identifications

Focuses on the absence of new instances of identification.

no additional identifications

Highlights the lack of further instances being identified.

none were further identified

Passive voice emphasizing the absence of further identification.

no one else was identified

Focuses on the lack of further individuals being identified.

identification ceased

Expresses that the process of identification has stopped.

identification is complete

Indicates that identification is finished, implying no more will be identified.

no remaining unidentified

Highlights that everything that could be identified has been.

FAQs

What does "no more identified" mean?

The phrase "no more identified" is not standard English and may be unclear. It generally means that something or someone is no longer being identified, or that there are no further entities to identify.

How can I rephrase "no more identified" for better clarity?

Consider using alternatives like "no further identified", "no longer identified", or "not identified anymore" depending on the intended meaning.

Is "no more identified" grammatically correct?

The phrase "no more identified" is grammatically questionable and can be confusing. It is better to use grammatically correct and clear alternatives, which helps ensure effective communication.

What's the difference between "no further identified" and "no more identified"?

"No further identified" implies a continuation was expected but did not happen, while "no more identified" is not a standard or grammatically recommended phrase. It's better to use "no further identified" to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity.