Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig'no means of' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to a lack of resources, usually with a negative connotation. For example: "With no means of transportation, he was forced to stay home."
Exact(59)
It possessed no means of self-defense.
The rabbis had no means of coercion.
He had no means of moving on – and no means of staying put.
There was no means of escape and no means of raising the alarm.
Student: Without a contract there's no means of enforcement.
And it provided no means of catching cheaters.
"They had no means of propulsion," Mr. Habib said.
He had no means of evading the woe.
They had no means of getting information themselves.
"I had no means of contacting match control".
Similar(1)
He was Senegalese and had no means of going with her.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com