Sentence examples for no localisation from inspiring English sources

The responses on these images suggest that apparent 'detection without localisation' can reflect coarse or less precise localisation, rather than no localisation, warranting image-level investigation.

To see whether there is evidence for the null hypothesis of no localisation information, we could instead calculate a Bayes Factor (BF).

For example, if participants click slightly outside the lesion, this would be categorised as incorrect, which would lead to the erroneous inference that there was no localisation information, whereas an analysis of the apparent error would clearly show localisation information.

First, to interpret a null effect as evidence for there being no effect (in this case no localisation), would need alternate statistics, such as a Bayes Factor (Dienes, 2011), to assess the degree of evidence for 'no effect'.

First, we would like to note that before concluding anything from a null localisation effect, we need to use statistics that can assess the evidence for no effect (no localisation when there is detection) rather than just no evidence.

To make the inference that there is no localisation, however, still requires a number of additional steps, including using an approach such as Bayes statistics, rather than standard frequentist statistics.

On the contrary, most of the fluvastatin-treated cells displayed a weak anti-p21 ras immunoreaction localised mainly in the cytoplasm; no specific localisation of the p21 ras peptide was observed at the level of the plasma membranes or nuclei.

Eleven patients showed uptake on the I-PET, which was also visible on the post-treatment scan in nine patients; in the other two patients, no uptake was observed on the post-treatment scan and no anatomical localisation could be confirmed.

In two patients (no. 10, 11), no uptake was observed on the post-treatment I scan and no anatomical localisation could be confirmed.

No tissue localisation of HAP1-like immunoreactivity was observed in normal ovarian surface epithelium.

Following depolymerisation of microtubules by cold treatment, no obvious localisation of CDK11p58 was observed at the mitotic centrosomes suggesting that the centrosomal localisation is microtubule dependent (data not shown).