no less wrathful

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no less wrathful" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something is just as angry or fierce as another person or thing being compared. Example: "Despite his calm demeanor, his thoughts were no less wrathful than those of his adversary."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

"He deserves no less".

The New York Times - Arts

A silver medallist no less.

Independent

And in "Gatsby," no less.

The New York Times

By doctors, no less.

Harvard University

Our guests deserve no less.

The New York Times

No less than that".

Wikipedia

No less than U.S. Atty.

Los Angeles Times

On Wilshire Boulevard, no less.

Los Angeles Times

No less, no more.

The New York Times

No less.

Cornell University

On purpose, no less.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no less wrathful", ensure that the context clearly establishes what the subject is being compared to. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "no less wrathful" in contexts where a milder emotion is more appropriate. The phrase implies significant anger, so ensure it aligns with the intended severity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no less wrathful" functions as a comparative adjective phrase. It is used to describe something as being equally angry or furious as something else. Ludwig AI confirms this usage, though examples are limited.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "no less wrathful" is a grammatically correct phrase used to compare intensities of anger. As Ludwig AI confirms, while understandable, the phrase isn't frequently encountered. When writing, ensure the comparison is clear. Alternatives like "equally furious" or "just as angry" might be more common. Consider your audience and context when using "no less wrathful" to ensure the appropriate level of formality and impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equally furious

This alternative directly replaces "wrathful" with "furious" maintaining a high degree of similarity.

just as angry

This option uses a more common word, "angry", while retaining the comparative aspect.

no less indignant

This substitution replaces "wrathful" with "indignant", implying a righteous anger.

similarly enraged

The adjective "enraged" replaces "wrathful", suggesting intense anger.

as furious

A more succinct way of expressing equivalent fury.

no less incensed

This variant uses "incensed", indicating great anger and outrage.

equally irate

Replace "wrathful" with "irate", meaning extreme anger.

just as furious

Swapping "no less" for "just as" and "wrathful" with "furious" offers a straightforward alternative.

as wrathful

A simpler phrasing emphasizing the equivalent intensity of wrath.

no less outraged

Using "outraged" instead of "wrathful" suggests anger stemming from a perceived injustice.

FAQs

How can I use "no less wrathful" in a sentence?

You can use "no less wrathful" to compare the intensity of someone's anger to another's or something else's. For example: "His silence was no less wrathful than her shouting".

What is a good substitute for "no less wrathful"?

Alternatives include "equally furious", "just as angry", or "similarly enraged". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it more common to say "no less angry" or "no less wrathful"?

"No less angry" is significantly more common due to the more frequent use of the word "angry" in everyday language. "Wrathful" suggests a more intense and often righteous anger.

What's the difference between "no less wrathful" and "equally wrathful"?

While both phrases indicate a similar level of anger, "no less wrathful" subtly emphasizes that the anger is not diminished or reduced, whereas "equally wrathful" simply states that the anger is of the same degree.