Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
no information received
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "no information received" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that you have not received any information or data from a source. Example: "As of today, we have not made any progress on the project because no information received from the client has been provided."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
In the end, the bureau had to conclude that there had been "no information received which would link subject Wilder with any espionage or subversive activities".
News & Media
* score: 0: no information received, 1: poor, 2: fair, 3: good, 4: very good, 5: excellent.
Science
In the case of health-care-related information and doctor-mediated information, this paper also presents determinants for (C) "breastfeeding information given before birth or on the maternity ward vs. after the maternity ward or no information received".
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
There were no significant differences in information received by HIV status.
Science
"We are considering the information received".
News & Media
The context modifier is the information received.
Science
A formative summary score was constructed and dichotomized based on a median split yielding (1) very much/much HIV information received and (0) some/little/no HIV information received.
Science
However, no information was received from the original authors.
Science
No information was received for the remaining sites.
Science
This entailed assuming, first, that those with no information had received these treatments and, second, that they had not.
Science
The interviews and the group discussions were stopped when the researcher no longer received new information related to the research question (data saturation).
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "no information received", clarify the source from which information was expected. This provides context and avoids ambiguity. For instance, "We have made no progress on the project because "no information received" from the client has been provided."
Common error
Avoid using "no information received" in a way that obscures who was supposed to provide the information. Be specific about the source. For example, instead of ""No information received", the project stalled", use "Because "no information received" from the engineering team, the project stalled".
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "no information received" functions as a statement indicating the absence of expected or requested data. Ludwig AI validates this, showing frequent usage across contexts where the lack of information is significant.
Frequent in
News & Media
44%
Science
44%
Formal & Business
12%
Less common in
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "no information received" is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase to indicate the absence of expected information. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and its presence across various sources, primarily News & Media and Science. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity regarding the source of the missing information. While generally neutral, context dictates the most fitting alternative from options such as "no data obtained" or "no updates received".
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
no data obtained
Replaces "information" with "data", implying a more technical or scientific context.
no updates received
Focuses on the absence of new or current information.
no communication received
Emphasizes the lack of any form of communication, not just information.
did not receive any details
Rephrases the lack of information in terms of a failure to receive details.
haven't been informed
Shifts the focus to the state of being uninformed.
no feedback was provided
Implies a lack of response or evaluation.
no input has been gathered
Highlights the absence of collected input or data.
we are unaware
States a lack of awareness due to missing information.
remained uninformed
Emphasizes the continued state of lacking information.
lacking pertinent information
Highlights the absence of information that is relevant or applicable to a situation.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "no information received" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, you could use phrases like "no data obtained" or "no communication received", depending on the context.
What does "no information received" imply?
It implies that someone expected to get some information, but they didn't. It doesn't specify why the information wasn't received, only that it wasn't.
Is it better to say "no information was received" instead of "no information received"?
"No information was received" is grammatically complete, but "no information received" is often used in headlines, summaries or when brevity is needed. Both forms are correct.
When is it appropriate to use "no information received"?
It's appropriate when you want to state that a piece of expected information hasn't arrived, or wasn't communicated. This is common in official reports, news, and summaries of events.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested