no grounds for

USAGE SUMMARY

"no grounds for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is often used when questioning the basis or reasoning behind an idea or decision. For example, "The judge refused to grant the divorce, citing no grounds for the decision."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But there are no grounds for Schadenfreude.

The Economist

I've no grounds for complaint.

The Guardian - Books

No grounds for feeling smug here.

The Guardian

There are no grounds for a retrial.

The Guardian

There are no grounds for Cuba still to be there.

The Economist

"There are no grounds for concern," he said.

The New York Times

Police have now decided there are no grounds for action.

The Guardian - Money

"There are no grounds for pessimism," he said.

The Guardian

The authorities found no grounds for charging him.

The Guardian

The judge later found no grounds for a retrial.

The New York Times - Books

Startlingly enough, police investigation found no grounds for a criminal prosecution.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "no grounds for" when you want to emphasize the absence of a legitimate foundation or reason. This phrase is particularly effective in formal writing and argumentative contexts.

Common error

While "grounds" is typically used in the plural, ensure it is used correctly with "no". Avoid constructions like "there is no ground for", as it should be "there are "no grounds for"."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no grounds for" functions as a negative assessment of justification. It indicates the absence of a valid reason, cause, or basis for a particular action, belief, or feeling. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

80%

Science

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "no grounds for" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to express the lack of justification or reason for something. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in various contexts, particularly in news and media, science, and formal business settings. Its function is to negate the validity of a claim or action, emphasizing the absence of a solid foundation. While alternatives such as "no reason for" or "no basis for" exist, "no grounds for" carries a slightly more formal tone, making it suitable for professional and legal contexts. Remember to use the plural form "grounds" and ensure the context clearly indicates what lacks justification.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no justification for

Replaces "grounds" with "justification", emphasizing the absence of a valid reason.

no basis for

Substitutes "grounds" with "basis", focusing on the lack of a foundation or support.

no reason for

Uses "reason" instead of "grounds", highlighting the absence of a logical explanation.

no cause for

Replaces "grounds" with "cause", suggesting there is no valid reason or motive.

no warrant for

Uses "warrant" to indicate a lack of authorization or justification.

no pretext for

Emphasizes the lack of a false reason or excuse.

no excuse for

Focuses on the absence of a valid explanation to defend an action.

no justification to

Shifts the focus to a specific action or behavior that lacks justification.

no reason to

Similar to "no reason for", but emphasizes the lack of motivation or necessity to do something.

unwarranted

Expresses that something is not justified or authorized, without needing the "no grounds for" structure.

FAQs

How can I use "no grounds for" in a sentence?

You can use "no grounds for" to express that there is no valid reason or justification for something. For example, "The judge stated there were "no grounds for" an appeal".

What's the difference between "no grounds for" and "no reason for"?

While similar, "no grounds for" often implies a more formal or legalistic context, suggesting a lack of sufficient evidence or justification. "No reason for" is generally more versatile and can apply to a broader range of situations. You can use alternatives like "no reason for" depending on the context.

What are some alternatives to using "no grounds for"?

Alternatives include "no basis for", "no justification for", or "unwarranted", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it ever correct to say "there is no ground for" instead of "there are no grounds for"?

While "ground" can sometimes be used in a singular sense (e.g., "common ground"), in the context of "no grounds for", using the plural form "grounds" is the standard and grammatically correct usage. Therefore, prefer using "there are "no grounds for"".