Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
There were no suprathreshold clusters at the long rate, with S + D blocks inducing no greater activity than S blocks.
No greater activity was obtained by using a mixture of the two inhibitors used at 25 µM concentration.
Assuming that activity in response to ListWhite was stable across sessions, there was no greater activity in cortical or subcortical grey matter regions in response to ListNorm during session one relative to either two or three or in session two relative to three.
Similar(57)
No regions demonstrated greater activity for F than R items.
One region, the right middle frontal gyrus [ x = 48, y = 18, z = 45; T = 4.57], exhibited greater activity for No Source than Source word trials, with no significant difference evident for either objects or scenes.
No regions exhibited the opposite pattern of activity for words (i.e., greater activity for No Source than Source).
The left perirhinal cortex demonstrated greater activity for No Source than Source items for objects, with no reliable effects seen for words or scenes (see Fig. 4).
By contrast, bilateral medial (precuneus, posterior cingulate) and lateral parietal cortices (intraparietal sulcus), exhibited greater activity for No Source compared to Source items (see Fig. 2).
Finally, middle cingulate (extending into the anterior cingulate) and right lateral PFC demonstrated greater activity for No Source than for Source trials, where Source and CR items did not reliably differ (see Table 4).
One possibility is that this particular effect at study reflects relational binding for details that were not necessarily relevant for the subsequent source memory task (i.e., non-criterial recollection), resulting in greater activity for No Source trials.
Within posterior MTL regions, activity did not differ between No Source and CR items (i.e., Source > No Source = CR, see Fig. 3) while in more anterior regions, both Source and CR items exhibited greater activity than No Source items (i.e., Source = CR > No Source).
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com