no found

USAGE SUMMARY

No found is not correct and usable in written English.
If you wish to use a negative term, you would need to use 'not found'. For example: I looked everywhere for my keys, but they were not found.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

Unlike ersatz "found footage" flicks like "Paranormal Activity" that involve no found footage and often no film (invariably these distractions are shot and shown digitally), this is the real deal, having been constructed from original filmed images.

The New York Times

Fungal plant pathogens decreased significantly over a land abandonment gradient, while we no found significant differences among fungal antagonists in the three habitats.

Acta Oecologica

The amounts of NO found in the off-gases were at a maximum (24 ppm), when the bed was at ∼500 °C for λ="[O2]/[O2]stoich="1.05.

Combustion and Flame

As optima are often in a flat part of the efficiency curve, as a function of the parameters, a disturbance in the calculation might lead to no found optimum at all for the optimization routine.

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

This might seem surprising for a composer known for appropriating and recycling the material of other composers: in fact, in my score there are no found musical objects and only one direct quotation - from my own work.

The Guardian - Music

In a study carried out by the Universities of Southampton and Edinburgh, scientists investigated the role of a molecule, nitric oxide (NO) found in the skin and in the blood, which is involved with the regulation of blood pressure.

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

No finds have yet been reported.

The New York Times

No find of the century.

HuffPost

No mouthpiece found.

Yale University

No databases found.

Princeton University

No entries found.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "not found" instead of "no found". The former is grammatically correct and widely accepted.

Common error

Avoid using "no" as a direct substitute for "not" before a past participle. "No" typically modifies nouns, whereas "not" is used to negate verbs. For instance, say "the error was not found" instead of "the error was no found".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no found" functions as an incorrect attempt to negate the past participle "found". It tries to express that something was not located or discovered. As Ludwig AI points out, it's grammatically unsound.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no found" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal and informal writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's best to use "not found" or other similar alternatives such as "not discovered" or "not located". While there are a few instances of "no found" in various sources, their limited number and the phrase's incorrect grammar suggest sticking to the proper alternatives to ensure clear and professional communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not found

Replaces "no" with "not" to create a grammatically correct negative form.

was not found

Adds the auxiliary verb "was" for correct passive voice construction.

were not found

Adds the auxiliary verb "were" for correct plural passive voice construction.

not discovered

Uses a synonym for "found" to indicate a lack of discovery.

not located

Uses "located" as a synonym, implying a failure to find something's location.

not identified

Emphasizes the absence of identification rather than just physical finding.

not detected

Suggests a failure to detect something, often used in scientific or technical contexts.

remained undiscovered

Indicates that something has not been discovered over a period of time.

failed to find

Expresses the inability to find something.

nothing was found

Emphasizes that absolutely nothing was discovered.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "no found"?

The correct way to express the idea of something not being discovered is to use "not found". For example, "The keys were not found".

Is it ever correct to use "no found" in a sentence?

No, "no found" is grammatically incorrect in standard English. Use "not found" or a similar phrase instead.

What are some alternatives to "no found"?

Alternatives include "not discovered", "not located", and "not identified", depending on the specific context.

How does "not found" differ from "no found"?

"Not found" is grammatically correct and uses "not" to negate the verb "found". "No found" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't follow standard English sentence structure; therefore, "not found" should always be preferred.