no findings

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no findings" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as research, investigations, or reports to indicate that no results or conclusions were reached. Example: "After conducting the survey, we concluded that there were no findings to support the initial hypothesis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No findings were noted.

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

No findings have yet been made public.

The Guardian

No findings have yet been disclosed.

The Guardian - Sport

"There are no findings of wrongdoing," he explained.

The New York Times

It offers no findings and no specific conclusions.

The Guardian - Opinion

It makes no findings of fact, let alone guilt.

The Guardian - Opinion

The judge makes no findings and resolves no factual matter.

Cornell University

He made no findings on the merits of the case.

The New York Times

With the investigation closed, no findings will be released, he said.

The New York Times

Federal senator Arthur Sinodinos was referenced in the report but Icac made no findings against him.

The Guardian

Magellan said it was co-operating with the investigations; no findings have been made.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting research or investigation results, use "no findings" to clearly and concisely state that no significant or noteworthy outcomes were observed. This avoids ambiguity and ensures clarity for the reader.

Common error

Avoid implying that "no findings" automatically equates to a failure or invalidity of the research. Instead, present it as a neutral outcome, emphasizing that the investigation simply didn't reveal the anticipated results, which is still a valid outcome.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no findings" functions as a declarative statement indicating the absence of significant results or outcomes in a study, investigation, or analysis. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a usable and correct expression.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

41%

News & Media

41%

Academia

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "no findings" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote the absence of significant results or outcomes, according to Ludwig AI. It's commonly found in scientific reports, news articles, and academic papers to convey that an investigation or study did not yield noteworthy data. While interchangeable with phrases like ""absence of results"" or ""lack of evidence"", "no findings" carries a slightly more formal tone. When using "no findings", ensure you present it as a neutral conclusion, avoiding implications of failure, and focus on the factual outcome of the investigation. Ludwig provides numerous examples, highlighting the phrase's versatility and applicability across various domains.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

absence of results

Focuses on the lack of tangible outcomes.

lack of evidence

Highlights the absence of supporting data or proof.

no conclusive results

Emphasizes that the results obtained were not definitive.

inconclusive outcomes

Indicates that the results did not lead to a firm conclusion.

no significant results

States that the results were not statistically meaningful.

no discernible effects

Focuses on the absence of noticeable impacts or changes.

absence of any indication

Highlights the lack of any sign or suggestion.

nothing of note discovered

Emphasizes that nothing important or remarkable was found.

no information obtained

Focuses on the lack of acquired knowledge or data.

outcomes were unremarkable

Indicates the findings were ordinary or not noteworthy.

FAQs

What does "no findings" mean in a research context?

In research, "no findings" signifies the absence of significant or noteworthy results. It indicates that the study or investigation did not yield any outcomes that support or reject the initial hypothesis. It's similar to saying there was a "lack of evidence".

How can I use "no findings" in a sentence?

You can use "no findings" to report that an investigation or analysis didn't produce any significant results. For example: "The investigation concluded with "no significant results"" or "The audit revealed "absence of results" indicating fraud".

What are some alternatives to "no findings"?

Alternatives to "no findings" include "absence of results", "lack of evidence", "no conclusive results", or "inconclusive outcomes". The choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to say "no results" or "no findings"?

Both "no results" and "no findings" are acceptable, but "no findings" might be slightly more formal and often used in official reports, studies, or investigations. "No results" is more general and can be used in a broader range of contexts, although they both indicate the "outcomes were unremarkable".