no faults were identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no faults were identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as reports, assessments, or evaluations to indicate that no issues or problems were found. Example: "After a thorough review of the system, we can confirm that no faults were identified during the inspection."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Police Scotland said: "Following detailed inspection, in line with the latest airworthiness directive, no faults were identified and the force helicopter was available for operational deployment".

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Three generations of sinistral faults were identified.

Journal of African Earth Sciences

The first residents moved into New Lawrence House in 2009 but were forced to move out the week after the Grenfell Tower fire in 2017 after serious safety faults were identified.

The Guardian - Business

Release faults were identified nearly perpendicular or oblique to master faults, forming marginal strike ramps and horst structures in all subbasins.

Journal of South American Earth Sciences

The polygonal faults were identified in a stratigraphic sequence dominated by calcareous clay with minor calcilutite at its lower section that changes to argillaceous calcilutite and calcareous claystone at its upper section.

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

Two regional growth faults were identified towards the northern part of the Greater Ughelli depobelt.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

Several lesser faults were identified within the coal basin by geophysical seismic survey.

Environmental Systems Research

After the 2011 Hamadori earthquake, two subparallel faults (the Itozawa and Yunodake faults) were identified by field surveys.

Earth, Planets and Space

Major and minor faults were identified based mainly on break in reflection events or abrupt termination of reflection events.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

In the present study, many faults were identified in the sedimentary unit and some of them can be interpreted as active faults by offsetting of reflections at the seafloor (Figs. 2 and 8).

Earth, Planets and Space

Faults are identified on seismic-reflection data... Geological Survey (U.S.).

University of California, Berkeley

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "no faults were identified" in formal reports and technical documentation to clearly communicate the absence of problems or errors. It's a concise and professional way to state that an inspection or assessment found no issues.

Common error

While "no faults were identified" is grammatically correct, overuse of the passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Consider using the active voice when appropriate. For example, instead of "no faults were identified by the team", you could say "the team identified no faults".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no faults were identified" primarily functions as a statement of result following an inspection, assessment, or evaluation. As noted by Ludwig AI, it indicates that no issues or problems were found. This usage is supported by the example provided by Ludwig which shows a police force confirming "no faults were identified" after a detailed inspection.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

66%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no faults were identified" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase in English, typically employed in formal and technical contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its suitability for indicating the absence of problems or errors after an evaluation. While less frequent in general usage, it is common in reporting inspection results across diverse sectors like engineering, manufacturing, and IT. Alternative phrases such as "no errors were found" or "no issues were discovered" can be used to convey a similar meaning, and writers should be aware of the potential for overusing the passive voice. When writing content, take into account that the main goal is to state a fact in a clear, direct and professional way.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no errors were found

Replaces "faults" with "errors", a more general term for problems.

no defects were detected

Substitutes "faults" with "defects", implying imperfections or flaws.

no issues were discovered

Uses "issues" instead of "faults", suggesting a broader range of problems.

no problems were observed

Replaces "faults" with "problems", indicating difficulties or challenges.

no malfunctions were noted

Substitutes "faults" with "malfunctions", implying operational failures.

the inspection revealed no faults

Rephrases the sentence to emphasize the inspection process.

the assessment showed no defects

Similar to the previous one but using the word "assessment" instead of "inspection".

everything checked out

An informal way of saying that no problems were found during an inspection.

the system is fault-free

Expresses the absence of faults by describing the system as "fault-free".

the device is in perfect working order

Indicates that the device is functioning without any faults or problems.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "no faults were identified"?

You can use alternatives such as "no errors were found", "no defects were detected", or "no issues were discovered" depending on the context.

Is "no faults were identified" grammatically correct?

Yes, "no faults were identified" is grammatically correct. It uses the passive voice to indicate that an inspection or assessment found no problems.

What does "no faults were identified" mean?

It means that after a thorough inspection or assessment, no errors, defects, or problems were found. It indicates a clean bill of health for the system, process, or item being evaluated.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "no faults were identified"?

It's appropriate in formal reports, technical documentation, assessments, and evaluations where you need to clearly and professionally communicate the absence of problems or errors. It is common in both technical and "formal language".