no facility for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no facility for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the absence of a specific service, feature, or capability in a particular context. Example: "The hotel has no facility for laundry services, so guests must find an alternative."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

Scott: We have no facility for addressing the subject.

The New York Times - Magazine

"I had no facility for physics," he shrugs.

The Guardian

Donna had been able to talk to anyone, but he had no facility for casual chatter.

The New Yorker

At 13, Krayzelburg had little facility for English and no facility for swimming in his neighborhood.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. McKenzie had no facility for time steps but took an immediate shine to ballet.

The New York Times

There was no facility for readers to discuss my recommended links on the Guardian Weblog, or suggest their own.

The Guardian - Tech

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

36 human-written examples

The witness said that there were no facilities for such people.

The New Yorker

Unlike at downhill resorts, there are no facilities for making snow deep in the woods.

The New York Times - Sports

The report notes there are no facilities for blood culture tests in the centre.

The Guardian

The Dean doesn't want them because there are no facilities for four or five thousand porcupines.

The New Yorker

The country would love to welcome tourists, as yet it has no facilities for them.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no facility for", ensure the context clearly indicates what is lacking. For instance, "The old building had "no facility for" disabled access", is much clearer than a simple "no facility".

Common error

Avoid using "no facility for" when you actually mean a person lacks the ability to do something. "He has "no facility for" languages" is less accurate than "He has no aptitude for languages."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no facility for" functions as a negative descriptor, indicating the absence of a particular capability, resource, or service. Ludwig AI examples show it expressing a lack of infrastructure, skills, or provisions.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

28%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Huffington Post

4%

The New Yorker

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "no facility for" is a commonly used phrase to indicate the absence of a specific capability, resource, or service. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct and suitable for use in various contexts, particularly in news, scientific, and encyclopedic writing. When using the phrase, ensure it clearly conveys the lack of a particular feature or service. Be mindful not to confuse "facility" with "ability" and adjust the related alternatives based on the context to refine its precision and impact. Though "no facility for" is quite commonly used, consider alternatives when appropriate to add nuance and emphasis to your message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no provision for

Focuses on the lack of arrangements or preparation made for something.

lack of capacity for

Emphasizes the absence of the ability or power to do something.

absence of means for

Highlights the non-existence of resources or methods to achieve something.

without the capability for

Stresses the lack of inherent skill or potential to do something.

no resources available for

Specifically points out the absence of usable assets or support for a particular purpose.

not equipped for

Indicates a lack of the necessary tools, equipment, or training to handle something.

no infrastructure for

Refers to the absence of basic physical and organizational structures needed for operation.

unable to support

Highlights the inability to provide assistance or maintain something.

lacking the ability for

Emphasizes that there is no skill available for completing a certain task.

does not accommodate

Highlights the lack of accommodation of resources for an object.

FAQs

How can I use "no facility for" in a sentence?

Use "no facility for" to indicate the absence of a specific service, feature, or capability. For example: "The hospital has "no facility for" treating rare diseases."

What can I say instead of "no facility for"?

You can use alternatives such as "no provision for", "lack of capacity for", or "absence of means for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "no facility for" or "no facilities for"?

Both are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "No facility for" refers to a general lack of capability, while "no facilities for" indicates the absence of physical resources or infrastructure.

What's the difference between "no facility for" and "not equipped for"?

"No facility for" implies a more fundamental lack of capability or provision, while "not equipped for" suggests a lack of necessary tools or equipment to handle something. The first is a general lack of capacity and the second suggests equipment.