Sentence examples for no diversion from from inspiring English sources

There was to be no diversion from Balanchine's style: arriving on the "one" (with the music), emphasizing the contrast between closed positions and stretched open ones, and in general, concentrating on the vibrant musicality of his steps.

Enacting a variety of dog-eared dramas, the mostly polished cast is hampered by an unfunny script (by the director, Kurt Voelker) and desiccated surroundings that offer no diversion from the general buffoonery.

This week, although the Tevez affair continues to drag on like a sore throat, and Mancini again refused to discuss it, a weariness about the saga and how it will eventually be concluded meant that this time it provided no diversion from the stinging 2-1 defeat in Naples.

However, using an intense sound source (a "dog dazer" PetTrainer™ emitting a 26 kHz tone, 109 dB SPL at 1 m) we checked transmission loss up to 32 m and found no diversion from spherical spreading.

In an interview, President Bush's national security adviser, Stephen J. Hadley, insisted that there was no diversion of resources from Afghanistan, and he cited recently declassified statistics to show that troop levels in Afghanistan rose at crucial moments — like the 2004 Afghan election — even after the Iraq war began.

Discovering the origin of OK was, he said, no more than an agreeable diversion from his main work.

Baiting Brand was no doubt a welcome diversion from the problems Ukip's Bird was having with Bolter, who had decided his behaviour was a bit too masculine and accused him of sexual harassment.

There are no unnecessary diversions from the central telling of the ancient myth: King Oedipus unwittingly killed his father, married his mother and is responsible for the plague now destroying the city state of Thebes: "Women give birth to buckets of blood./ Meat turns to manure in our hands", as McGuinness puts it.

But the old idea of biofuels as merely a green diversion from the real world can no longer hold.

Deviations are costly because they represent a diversion from the national target, no matter how it has been determined.

It takes no PhD in economics to predict a big price impact from significant farmland diversion from food to fuel.