no difference identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no difference identified" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it in contexts where you are reporting findings or results that show no variation or distinction between items or groups being compared. For example: "After conducting the analysis, we found that there was no difference identified between the two samples." Alternative expressions include "no differences found" and "no distinctions noted."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

There was no difference identified between the patterns of surface change between the ASR and Articuleze -specimens.

Bone and Joint Research

However further research is required on other outcomes where there was no difference identified including assisted vaginal deliveries, C/S, perineal trauma, maternal infection, Apgar score < 7 at 5 mins, neonatal unit admissions or neonatal infection rates.

BMC Public Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

There were also no differences identified between the TVT and LOS for each group.

BMJ Open

An important piece of information found, after statistical analyses, was that there were no differences identified between exercise protocols.

Clinical interventions in aging

There were no differences identified even when the group was divided in BW < 1000 g and 1000-1499 g.

BMC Pediatrics

A glycoside hydrolase (Cthe_0624) was upregulated at 12 hours on switchgrass compared to 37 hours on switchgrass with no differences identified on Populus.

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Lactate, typically a minor fermentation product was dramatically increased after furfural treatment (Table  1) despite no differences identified in the expression of the gene encoding lactate dehydrogenase (Cthe_1053) under this condition (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Biotechnology for Biofuels

There was no statistical difference identified in the Kleihauer-Betke test results between any of the study groups.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

For the domains of pain and anxiety/depression there was no significant difference identified between the three groups.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

There was no significant difference identified in descriptive scores for the two cohorts of respondents for the 10 items, therefore the findings of both cohorts are reported together.

BMC Medical Education

There were no significant differences identified between the three positions in MAP, HR, ˙VE, or O2sat at any time period.

Forensic Science International

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure the subject matches the number of comparisons; use 'no differences identified' when multiple variables are analyzed.

Common error

In scientific writing, 'identified' implies a systematic process of checking or testing. Avoid using subjective verbs like 'noticed' when you are referring to the results of a statistical analysis.

Linguistic Context

This phrase functions as a passive summary statement used to denote the absence of variance. In the examples provided by Ludwig, it often appears as a complement to the verb 'to be' (e.g., 'there was "no difference identified"').

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

92%

Academia

6%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

News & Media

0.5%

Social Media

0.2%

Informal

0.3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In conclusion, "no difference identified" is a cornerstone phrase in scientific and technical writing. Analysis of the data from Ludwig shows it is the preferred way to report a lack of variance between study groups or experimental conditions. The phrase conveys a high degree of objectivity and professionalism. Ludwig AI highlights that while it is technically correct in any context, its clinical tone makes it most suitable for research papers, medical reports and data-driven business summaries rather than informal or creative prose.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no differences were found

Uses a plural noun and a more common verb to report findings.

no significant difference was observed

Adds a statistical qualifier often required in academic reporting.

no variation was detected

Focuses on the detection of change rather than a static difference.

no distinction was noted

Slightly more observational and formal in tone.

the results were comparable

Shifts the focus to the similarity of the items being compared.

no disparity was identified

Uses a more formal synonym for difference, often used in social sciences.

without any identifiable difference

A prepositional phrasing that can be used as an adverbial modifier.

no measurable difference

Specifies that the lack of difference pertains to the metrics used.

zero difference identified

Provides a more emphatic or quantitative tone.

not notably different

A softer, more descriptive way to state the same conclusion.

FAQs

How do I use "no difference identified" in a sentence?

You can use it to summarize findings, for example: "There was "no difference identified" between the control group and the experimental group."

Is "no difference identified" formal?

Yes, it is highly formal and most commonly used in scientific journals such as those found on Ludwig. It is preferred over less formal versions like "it was the same".

What is the difference between "no difference identified" and "no differences identified"?

The singular version refers to a specific, singular comparison, while "no differences identified" is used when multiple parameters or variables were investigated and none showed change.

Can I say "no statistical difference identified"?

Yes, adding 'statistical' or using "no significant difference" is actually more common in academic research to clarify the nature of the finding.