Sentence examples for no demonstrable differences from inspiring English sources

Two randomized controlled trials with 79 patients and another with 88 patients comparing PRP fibrin matrix (PRFM) versus control on rotator cuff tendon healing showed no demonstrable differences on tendon healing and clinical rating scales.

But there were no demonstrable differences in fat content of skeletal muscle, or fat content of other tissues, in the A1 animals, suggesting that the mechanism for enhanced insulin sensitivity is not the result of reduced levels of fat in skeletal muscle or other organs.

A diverse range of health professionals and support staff were included in these studies with no demonstrable differences in training or accuracy, however typists (including health professionals) who are competent and presumably fast typists have some difficulty adapting to SR systems [ 22] ie., more benefit is obtained for slower typists.

The components of the endothelin axis were identifiable by immunohistochemical staining, with no demonstrable difference found between groups.

It should be noted that besides approximately 7 nm also approximately 10 nm Pd NPs were used to fabricate hydrogen sensors, and no demonstrable difference in their sensitivity was observed.

However, no demonstrable difference between use of the heart sound simulator and bedside training was found.

Furthermore, there was no demonstrable difference in detection rate between studies that used one, two, or multiple markers.

For spontaneous and stimulated pain a significant reduction in pain was shown in all 3 groups (p < 0.01) with no demonstrable difference between the 3 topical agents.

Therefore there was no demonstrable difference in the reproducibility of ASL measurements made at 1.5 T or 3.0 T in healthy volunteers.

Multiple diffusion gradient directions are not necessarily useful as the liver appears isotropic with no demonstrable difference in reported ADC values related to the direction of the diffusion gradient [ 23].

In these lapsed children, the time since they lapsed was the strongest predictor of re-registration however there was no demonstrable difference in re-registrations between the control group and any of the interventions.