no contribution to

USAGE SUMMARY

"no contribution to" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
For example, "The professor made no contribution to the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It also had made no contribution to youth business development," the report said.

The Guardian

We have made no contribution to global warming that can move the needle.

The New Yorker

When the field is perpendicular to the path, there is no contribution to the line integral.

Britannica

In this biological context, melatonin makes no contribution to salivary IgA secretion.

Nature

This rotational flow has no contribution to the generation of thrust, but instead produces energy loss.

International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

In particular, they should aim to make no contribution to climate change.

Public Health

Some would say at this point: "So what, the transfer traffic makes no contribution to London".

The Economist

One look at the nutrition label and it's clear this drink makes no contribution to the diet beyond the calories.

The New York Times - Food

Among its authors are Tad Murty, a former scientist who believes human activity makes no contribution to global warming.

The Guardian

And the cuts are now beginning to bite as the government made no contribution to growth last quarter".

The Guardian

The ONS noted that spending on goods, tourism and services made no contribution to the overall growth in spending.

The Guardian - Money

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no contribution to", ensure the context clearly indicates what is not being contributed to. For example, "This data makes "no contribution to" the analysis" is more precise than simply stating, "This data makes "no contribution"."

Common error

Avoid using "no contribution to" repeatedly in long, complex sentences. Break down the sentence or use synonyms to improve readability. Overuse can make the sentence sound monotonous and difficult to understand.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no contribution to" functions as a modifier, indicating the absence of a contributing factor to something. It typically connects a subject (e.g., an action, item, or idea) with the entity that receives no benefit or addition from it. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

38%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

2%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no contribution to" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression, as affirmed by Ludwig AI, used to denote the absence of any positive influence or additive effect. It's prevalent in scientific, news, and encyclopedic contexts, maintaining a neutral to formal tone. Alternative phrases like "no impact on" or "makes no difference to" may be substituted to achieve similar meanings. When using the phrase, clarity is key, ensuring that the context reveals precisely what isn't being contributed to. While versatile, it's best to avoid overuse in complex sentences to maintain readability. "No contribution to" accurately conveys a lack of beneficial addition or support.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no impact on

Focuses specifically on the lack of influence or effect.

does not contribute to

A more verbose phrasing that emphasizes the action of contributing.

makes no difference to

Highlights the lack of any noticeable change or alteration.

has no bearing on

Implies that something is irrelevant or unrelated.

exerts no influence on

Specifically refers to the absence of influence or power.

plays no part in

Emphasizes the lack of involvement or participation.

is irrelevant to

Indicates a lack of connection or relevance.

offers no support to

Focuses on the absence of assistance or backing.

adds nothing to

Highlights that something brings no new value or substance.

has no effect on

Similar to "no impact on", but can also suggest a lack of emotional effect.

FAQs

What does "no contribution to" mean?

The phrase "no contribution to" means that something or someone does not add or provide anything of value, importance, or assistance to a particular situation, process, or outcome.

How can I use "no contribution to" in a sentence?

You can use "no contribution to" to indicate a lack of impact or support, as in "The new policy made "no contribution to" solving the problem" or "His work made "no contribution to" the project's success".

What are some alternatives to saying "no contribution to"?

Alternatives include "no impact on", "makes no difference to", or "has no bearing on". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "no contribution to" or "does not contribute to"?

Both "no contribution to" and "does not contribute to" are grammatically correct. "No contribution to" is more concise and often preferred for its directness, while "does not contribute to" may be chosen for emphasis or clarity in certain contexts.