Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(59)
Making things all the more strange is the lack of any clear cut pattern: for many, it seems to have been re-enabled around June of this year.
Although we found a distinct differentiation between ecotypes with respect to their otolith morphology, no clear-cut pattern of trait evolution along the two ecological gradients was discernible.
However, no clear-cut pattern was observed in referral or diagnosis time by co-morbidity score in this study, but those with poorer PS had increased likelihood of referral and diagnosis within target.
However, as we found no clear-cut patterns, these factors need further investigation in a larger group of women from the birth cohort.
As a matter of fact, using a NAS score, only about half of all children could be categorized into a clear cut pattern, while the other half fell into the "borderline" category, supporting the need for a more reproducible scoring system to interpret liver histology in pediatric cases of NAFLD/NASH.
Ultimately, there are no clear cut solutions.
Looks like there is no clear cut winner yet.
Again, no clear cut advantage.
There are no clear cut rules.
But the lines are no longer so clear cut.
In contrast to CH4 fluxes, which showed no clear diurnal pattern after the second cut in both years, the meadow constantly emitted N2O during daytime and before the third cut in 2011, on average up to 26.8 ± 23.3 ng m−2 s−1 around noon, while during daytime after the third cut in 2010 N2O was transported to the meadow, peak deposition amounted to −7.5 ± 8.8 ng m−2 s−1 on average.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com