Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(23)
The use of Fourier-transform spectrometers has provided a method for studying many short-lived species such as free radicals (i.e., OH, CN, NO, CF, CCH), molecular ions (i.e., CO+, HCO+, HCS+), and Van der Waals complexes (i.e., C6H6−HCl, H2O−H2O, Kr−HF, SO2−SO2).
(E ) The Purkinje cell firing rate (baseline subtracted) during the first (dashed lines) and second trials (solid lines) of CF – No CF (blue) and No CF – No CF pairs (black) during VOR-decrease training.
Increasing the "coverage" of each video film (i.e. nR nO, cf. Eq. 6) from 0.31 to 1.0 yields a fully-balanced design, as described in design 4.
Aerobic addition of approximately 40 µM proliNO (giving 78 µM NO) induces the oxidation of about 2 μM cytochrome c in phosphate buffer, with a time course that tracks the decay of the NO (cf. Figs. 3a and b).
Thus, there was no difference in the sensory (visual) error that could explain the different changes in Purkinje cell output and behavior on trials after CF trials vs No CF trials.
For each training condition and each cell, we identified all pairs of consecutive trials in which a climbing fiber spike (CF) occurred in the analysis window on the first trial but not the second trial (No CF), and all pairs of consecutive trials in which there was no climbing fiber spike in the analysis window on either trial (No CF No CF pairs).
Similar(37)
Forty years on from Raw Power, a classic of nihilist ramalama Iggy remains a guy with "no belief" and "no gratitude" (cf Job).
The presence of air/oxygen led to a significant improvement in the leaching of metals, e.g., %14 Cu (no air/oxygen) cf. complete copper extraction at ≥ 2 L/min air/oxygen over 120 min.
There were no significant changes in the No CF No CF trial pairs based on their confidence interval.
THo, NO, and CF analyzed the microarray data.
No visible pellet was obtained, and no CFs were detected in the pellet by microscopic observation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com