no built-in safeguards

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no built-in safeguards" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation, system, or product that lacks inherent protections or measures to prevent misuse or errors. Example: "The software was released without any built-in safeguards, making it vulnerable to security breaches."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

With internships, no such built-in safeguards exist.

The New York Times

And in theory there are built-in safeguards.

The Guardian

If the Army had been slow, it was because of built-in safeguards.

The New Yorker

Finally, he said, the program has built-in safeguards and is regularly reviewed by government lawyers.

The New York Times

While the company said the device was still in a public testing phase, it also had built-in safeguards against interference.

The New York Times - Tech

The program, which has built-in safeguards against fraud, has proved a valuable tool for encouraging immigrant victims to come forward and testify against their attackers.

The New York Times

Even with the built-in safeguards, some of the Egyptian military's for-profit ventures have created quandaries for administrators of the Foreign Military Sales program, according to experts.

The New York Times

Lord Hope was less convinced that the built-in safeguards would be sufficient, although not to the extent of ruling for Shayler.

The Guardian

Automation can also reduce fraud, with built-in safeguards that look for anomalies like two or more claims for the same expense.

The New York Times

Second, if the hosts mount up and override the built-in safeguards that prevent them from hurting humans, will we care?

The Guardian - TV & Radio

(Certain cellphone providers, but not all, have built-in safeguards requiring the entry of a voice-mail password, even when the call appears to come from the phone itself).

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "no built-in safeguards", ensure the context clearly explains what potential risks or vulnerabilities arise from the absence of these protections.

Common error

Don't assume that just because a system lacks "no built-in safeguards", it is inherently unsafe. Explicitly state the need for external or additional safety measures to mitigate potential risks.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no built-in safeguards" functions as a descriptive element, indicating the absence of inherent protection mechanisms within a system, process, or product. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

News & Media

0%

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "no built-in safeguards" correctly describes the absence of inherent protective mechanisms within a system or product. Although Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's correct usage, example sentences are currently unavailable. The phrase's primary function is descriptive, aiming to inform about potential vulnerabilities. Its neutral register makes it suitable for diverse contexts. Remember to clearly articulate the specific risks associated with the lack of such safeguards when using this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

without inherent protections

This alternative replaces "built-in safeguards" with "inherent protections", focusing on the lack of intrinsic protective measures.

lacking intrinsic security

This phrase emphasizes the absence of internal security mechanisms.

devoid of automated security measures

This alternative highlights the absence of automatic security features.

no embedded safety features

This option uses "embedded safety features" to convey the lack of integrated safety mechanisms.

without integrated security protocols

This alternative focuses on the absence of integrated security protocols.

lacking internal failsafe mechanisms

This phrase emphasizes the absence of mechanisms that prevent failure or error.

no pre-installed safety nets

This option uses the metaphor of "safety nets" to describe the lack of protective measures.

without default protective systems

This alternative highlights the absence of default protective systems.

lacking factory-installed security

This phrase indicates that security features are not included from the point of manufacture.

devoid of automatic fail-safe systems

This alternative expresses the lack of systems that automatically prevent failure.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "no built-in safeguards"?

You can use alternatives like "without inherent protections", "lacking intrinsic security", or "devoid of automated security measures" depending on the specific context.

What does "no built-in safeguards" mean?

The phrase "no built-in safeguards" indicates that a system, process, or product lacks inherent safety mechanisms or protective measures that are integrated into its design or function.

Is it acceptable to start a sentence with "no built-in safeguards"?

Yes, it is grammatically acceptable to start a sentence with "no built-in safeguards", although it might be more common to use the phrase within a larger sentence structure for better flow and clarity.

How does "no built-in safeguards" differ from "lack of security measures"?

"No built-in safeguards" specifically implies that the safeguards were intended to be integrated or inherent to the system. "Lack of security measures" is a broader term that could also refer to a complete absence of any kind of security, whether built-in or external.