no assurance

USAGE SUMMARY

"no assurance" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It typically means to not have any guarantee or knowledge that something will or won't happen. For example, "The company had no assurance that their project would end up being successful."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

No assurance goes undoubted.

The New York Times

"There's no assurance," he said.

The New York Times - Sports

No assurance could be given".

The Guardian - Sport

If there's no information then there's no assurance.

The Guardian

"There's no assurance today I'll accept this," Judge Sifton said.

The New York Times

There's no assurance of life along the Line of Control.

The New York Times

There is no assurance that fears will soon abate.

The New York Times

"There can be no assurance that these contributions will continue".

The New York Times

And there's no assurance of me getting out of here".

The New York Times

There is, of course, no assurance that RFco will succeed.

The New York Times

No assurance of return in an investor's lifetime.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no assurance", clearly state what the lack of assurance pertains to. This adds clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "no assurance" when you actually mean to convey a negative certainty. "No assurance" simply means there is no guarantee, not that something will definitely not happen.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no assurance" functions primarily as a qualifier, modifying a statement to indicate a lack of guarantee or certainty. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a standard phrase. Examples show it often precedes a clause explaining what lacks assurance.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Formal & Business

10%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "no assurance" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase that indicates a lack of guarantee or certainty. As indicated by Ludwig AI, its usage is appropriate in various contexts, particularly in news, business, and scientific writing. When using "no assurance", be clear about what lacks assurance and avoid mistaking it for a statement of negative certainty. Alternatives such as "no guarantee" or "no certainty" can be used depending on the desired nuance. The phrase appears frequently in reputable sources like The New York Times and The Guardian, reinforcing its validity and widespread acceptance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no guarantee

Replaces "assurance" with "guarantee", emphasizing the absence of a formal promise.

no certainty

Substitutes "assurance" with "certainty", focusing on the lack of sureness about an outcome.

no promise

Replaces "assurance" with "promise", highlighting the absence of a commitment.

cannot be guaranteed

Expresses the lack of guarantee using a passive construction.

not guaranteed

A shorter, more direct way of saying that something is not guaranteed.

there's no certainty of

Adds "there's" to emphasize the lack of certainty.

it is not certain

Focuses on the uncertainty of a specific outcome.

there is doubt

Shifts the focus to the presence of doubt regarding an outcome.

not necessarily

Implies a lack of assurance by suggesting that something is not a given.

it's uncertain

Emphasizes the uncertainty of a situation or outcome.

FAQs

How can I use "no assurance" in a sentence?

You can use "no assurance" to indicate a lack of guarantee or certainty about a future event or outcome. For example, "There is "no assurance of success"" or "We have "no assurance that the project will be completed on time"".

What are some alternatives to "no assurance"?

Alternatives to "no assurance" include "no guarantee", "no certainty", "no promise", or "it is not certain". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "no assurance" or "no guarantee"?

Both "no assurance" and "no guarantee" are correct and often interchangeable. "Guarantee" often implies a formal commitment, while "assurance" can be slightly broader, encompassing a general feeling of certainty. However, in most contexts, the difference is minimal.

What does "no assurance" imply about the possibility of an event occurring?

"No assurance" implies that there is a lack of certainty or guarantee regarding the occurrence of an event. It does not mean the event will not happen, but rather that there's no basis to be confident it will happen. A possibility remains.