Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(21)
Particular attention ought to be given to these groups as they contribute in large measure to the rate of nonparticipation in the NIP, i.e., to a greater extent than well-known vaccine refusers such as specific religious groups and anthroposophics.
It is apparent that each NIP group possesses at least one NIP protein each from P. taeda and P. patens, with the exception of the NIP I group where no P. patens NIPs are represented thus far, suggesting that the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of P. patens and higher plants should have three ancestral NIP genes corresponding to the 3 groups.
Coming out into the nip, I am reminded that February provides people with the rare bonus of spare time in which they can say "thank you" when you hold the door for them.
Before taking a nip, I remember my brother's friend saying, "I thought you said your brother wouldn't drink".
The NIP subfamily consists of three major groups (NIP I, II, and III) ([ 24, 32]; see also Figure 1).
It is obvious that this region is highly subgroup specific for the NIP I and III groups.
Similar(38)
The SI value is calculated as follows: the gene-level normalized probe-set intensity is defined as NI = probeset intensity gene _ j level intensity for the j-th gene and the splicing-index value subsequently calculated as SI = log 2 NIps _ i NIps _ i ps_i: the i-th probe set intensity of the j-th gene.
"I nip and I'm proud," said Ashley Wright, as she posed in front of Anthropologie at the nurse-in on August 20.
However, the practical application of Johanson model to estimate normal stress on the ribbon is limited due to its requirement of accurate estimate of nip pressure i.e. pressure at the nip angle.
For instance, cohesin and the Nipped-B (i.e., NIPBL) cohesin loading factor bind to virtually all extragenic enhancers and many active promoters, and decreases in cohesin dosage reduce enhancer-promoter looping interactions (Kagey et al. 2010; Chien et al. 2011b; Seitan et al. 2011; Schaaf et al. 2013a).
However, the degree of functional divergence between NIP I/III was not remarkably significant, because there were only two CAASs with posterior probability >0.8.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com