Sentence examples for ng compared to from inspiring English sources

Similarly, in Case B the modeling of NG storage flattens the marginal costs of NG (compared to Case A), reducing the scattering and achieving an economic benefit to the sector (Fig. 9).

Third, considering the type B virus component of the Fluvax 2008®, we see Nanopatch™ delivery of low doses of HA induced substantial HI activity above the critical value of 1∶40 at 3 weeks, again indicative of protection at doses as low as 34 ng compared to 6000 ng with intramuscular injection.

Using a 2.5 fold cutoff the ADP method had the smallest number of genes over or under represented (635 at 500 ng input RNA, 979 at 50 ng) compared to unamplified RNA.

This is indicated by significantly shorter mean half-life at higher blood lipid TCDD concentrations (> 700 ppt) and higher TCDD mass in the body fat (> 7,000 ng) compared to means for the paired, lower body burden groups (Table 1).

We deduced that the more DNA (1 ng or 10 ng compared to 0.1 ng) must be used in PCR for detection of HAmo SINE may result from the mutation in primer-matched regions of HAmo sequences in the investigated species since the investigated species diverged more with cyprinids.

There is a marked difference in events, constraints, and filtering in DEN-ng compared to Ponder.

To determine whether quality data could be obtained from a broad range of input RNA, data obtained from amounts ranging from 25 ng to 800 ng were compared to those obtained at 200 ng.

This trial included patients with better prognostic features (for example, median PSA 8 ng ml−1 compared to 14 ng ml−1 in our current study) (Shipley et al, 1999; Parker et al, 2002).

The real concentrations of carbon-based nanomaterials in different environmental compartments are yet unknown but modeled release rates of carbon-based nanomaterials into soils (for EU) are higher for CNTs (1.51 ng kg−1 year−1), compared to fullerenes (0.058 ng kg−1 year−1).

The mean value (95% confidence interval) of RCF of breast cancer patients was 369.0 (333.3 404.6) ng ml−1 compared to 420.5 (335.8 505.2) ng ml−1 for control patients.

For sVCAM-1 we found significantly (P<0.05) elevated levels in patients (median: 394 ng ml−1) compared to the controls (median: 253 ng ml−1).