Sentence examples for new validity from inspiring English sources

Finally, a new validity index to characterize the number of clusters based on proposed approach to separation of clusters and Choquet integrals are proposed.

Therefore, two new validity criteria are proposed.

Furthermore, we propose two new validity criteria for Lemna gibba bioassays: variability of average specific and section-by-section segmented growth rate, complementary to average specific growth rate as the only validity criterion existing in guidelines for duckweed bioassays.

A new clustering validity evaluation function is designed based on the risk calculated by loss functions and possibilities.

The present paper proposes a new cluster validity measure as an additional criterion to help the decision making process in fuzzy cluster analysis.

Based on these two issues, we present a new cluster validity index capable of being used for type-1 Fuzzy C-Means (FCMs), Interval Type-2 FCM (IT2 FCM), and Possibilistic C-Means (PCMs) clustering algorithms.

In this study, we propose an enhanced fuzzy clustering algorithm related to α-cut interval descriptions of fuzzy numbers and a new cluster validity index, which occurs by α-cut intervals and adding two ad hoc functions in the compactness and separability measures.

A thorough validation for sub-channel and clad outer temperatures is also presented, confirming the ability of ANTEO+ in reproducing experimental data, homogeneously, in its new anticipated validity domain, with a relatively high degree of accuracy when compared to a reference tool like COBRA-IV-I-MIT.

Authenticity is then characterized by the "self-congruency" of an individual, collective or symbolic identity (Ferrara 1998: 70), and is thought of as providing a new universal validity that does not build on the generalizable but rather on the exemplary.

The multigroup analysis comparing the tri-factor engagement dimensions in the test sample (n = 313) and in a new, independent, validity sample (n = 296) with similar socio-demographic characteristics revealed both weak (equal factor weights: Δχ2(15) = 13.9; p = .588), strong (equal intercepts: Δχ2(15) = 18.3; p = .247) and structural (equal covariances: Δχ2(3) = 3.7; p = .296) invariance.

Moreover, we have introduced a new cluster validity method that utilizes the GO annotation to calculate the similarity of any given pair of genes in a cluster.