Sentence examples for nevertheless in general from inspiring English sources

Nevertheless, in general, or 2 could satisfy these schemes with low time complexity, as indicated previously.

Nevertheless, in general terms, a blood pressure equal to or greater than 180/100 mmHg may require intervention [15].

Nevertheless, in general, the NN model fails to improve on its hedging strategy benchmark for the 1-month investment horizon.

Nevertheless, in general cases, the regularity and uniqueness of weak solution is still an open problem for the three-dimensional case; see [19, 20].

Nevertheless, in general, researchers consider a thin layer, film or coating as one ranging from fractions of a nanometer to several micrometers in thickness.

Nevertheless in General Comment No. 19 'The Right to Social Security' it is specified that seasonal workers also should have access to unemployment benefits.

The N-connection °N may be described by its coefficients, ° N = N a ' b z ~ a ' ⊗ v ~ b Open image in new window, where c ~ A = ( z ~ b, v ~ a ) Open image in new window are defined by Equation 7 playing the role of local coordinate base (nevertheless, being in general nonholonomic because of nontrivial structure functions C bc a ( x ) ) Open image in new window on L π E Open image in new window.

Nevertheless, rosids in general have a number of characters that are rare elsewhere in the angiosperms, including nuclear endosperm development, simple perforations in vessel end-walls, diplostemony, mucilaginous epidermis, and epicuticular wax rosettes [ 2- 4].

Nevertheless, in a general election where the focus on Scotland is so strong, it may be tempting for the unwary to assume that the contests in the two countries can be framed interchangeably as nationalist versus Labour showdowns, with the Conservatives nowhere.

Nevertheless, in a general case, the separation of variables method is not applicable.

Consequently, in this space, inequality (1) is in fact an equality for every c ≥ 0. Nevertheless in a general Banach space, we do not know if this holds for 0 < c < 1.