Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
nevertheless for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "nevertheless for" is not correct and does not form a standard expression in written English.
It may be intended to convey a contrast or exception, but it requires additional context or restructuring to be clear and effective. Example: "The project faced numerous challenges; nevertheless, for the sake of progress, we continued to push forward."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Nevertheless, for most purposes reproduction is adequate.
Encyclopedias
Nevertheless, for me, there remained obstacles ahead.
News & Media
Nevertheless, for now Pakistan is on the payroll.
News & Media
Nevertheless, for an underground art project its reach was unprecedented.
News & Media
Nevertheless, for Mr. Medvedev, there was lavish praise.
News & Media
The rider asked nevertheless for a B analysis.
News & Media
Alternative, more democratic spaces nevertheless for technology development and debate.
News & Media
Nevertheless, for whatever reason, Chalmers was given the job.
News & Media
Nevertheless, for the Israelis, it's dai kvar (enough).
News & Media
Nevertheless, for the present discussion, such a picture is useful.
Encyclopedias
Nevertheless, for many Afghans he remained a popular figure.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using "nevertheless for" as it is not grammatically correct. Instead, use "nevertheless" followed by a comma, or choose alternative phrases that clearly convey the intended contrast.
Common error
A common error is directly following "nevertheless" with "for", which creates an ungrammatical construction. Ensure that "nevertheless" is used as a standalone adverb or is correctly integrated into a sentence with proper conjunctions or prepositions to maintain grammatical accuracy.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "nevertheless for" is an attempt to create a concessive prepositional phrase, but is grammatically incorrect. As indicated by Ludwig AI, this combination is not a standard expression in English and requires restructuring to be clear and effective. While "nevertheless" functions as an adverb, adding "for" creates an ungrammatical phrase.
Frequent in
News & Media
43%
Science
32%
Encyclopedias
5%
Less common in
Academia
3%
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "nevertheless for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI highlights, while the individual words are valid, their combination is non-idiomatic and potentially confusing. Although there are quite a few examples, a high expert rating based on grammatical correctness indicates that it's best to avoid this construction in formal writing. Instead, opt for alternatives such as "nevertheless", followed by a comma, or other concessive phrases to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy. The frequency of the phrase may imply usage, but its lack of grammatical correctness makes it unsuitable for polished, professional communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
nevertheless, despite this
Adds a clearer connector to emphasize the contrast, more explicit.
nonetheless, considering this
Uses a different introductory word with the addition of the proper use of considering.
however, taking this into account
Employs a simpler transition word and the addition of the proper use of taking into account.
even so, with regard to this
A more conversational alternative, emphasizing the circumstance.
all the same, in light of this
Offers a more direct contradiction, clarifying the condition.
in any event, regarding this
Highlights the certainty despite the preceding information.
be that as it may, considering this
A more formal and emphatic contradiction.
despite everything, keeping this in mind
Focuses on acknowledging and overcoming obstacles.
still, bearing this in mind
A concise way to indicate persistence despite the circumstance.
that said, keeping this in consideration
Signals a shift in perspective while maintaining relevance.
FAQs
How should I correctly use "nevertheless" in a sentence?
Use "nevertheless" as a standalone adverb, typically followed by a comma, to introduce a statement that contrasts with or overrides something that has been said previously. For example: "It was raining; nevertheless, we went for a walk."
What are some alternatives to the incorrect phrase "nevertheless for"?
Instead of "nevertheless for", try using "nevertheless" followed by a comma, "nonetheless", or "however" to introduce a contrasting statement.
Is "nevertheless for" considered grammatically correct in English?
No, "nevertheless for" is not a grammatically correct construction in standard English. It is advisable to avoid this phrase in formal writing and speaking.
What's the difference between "nevertheless" and "however"?
"Nevertheless" and "however" both introduce a contrast, but "nevertheless" often implies a stronger sense of concession or unexpectedness. While both can be used to show contrast, "however" is more versatile and can also indicate a simple change of topic or perspective.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested