nevertheless auspiciously for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "nevertheless auspiciously for" is not correct and does not form a coherent expression in written English.
It seems to attempt to combine contrasting ideas but lacks clarity and proper structure. Example: "The project faced numerous challenges; nevertheless, auspiciously for the team, they secured additional funding."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The day began auspiciously for Cone.

The New York Times - Sports

It has not started auspiciously for Lionel Messi and company.

The New York Times

The episode did not start auspiciously for the reporter, Qiu Ziming, 28.

The New York Times

THIS year has started auspiciously for Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey's prime minister.

The Economist

But the game did not begin auspiciously for the hometown heroes.

The New York Times - Style

The Brown regime did not start auspiciously for Saints, with Willie Manu, their big winter signing, losing the ball trying to smuggle it out of the tackle.

Independent

The new year didn't start auspiciously for Italy.

BBC

Noxious Neglect The 1990s began auspiciously for Latin American currencies with the establishment of Argentina's currency board.

Forbes

It started auspiciously for the away side with two early wickets, but as Kent stretched their lead to 150, it was always going to be tough to get into a position to save the match.

BBC

The day did not begin auspiciously for Hampshire as Lewis McManus was trapped lbw by seamer Brooks, who took 4-57 in the first innings, with the eighth ball of the day.

BBC

The weekend did not begin auspiciously for Nationals shortstop Danny Espinosa, an alum of Santa Ana Mater Dei High and Cal State Long Beach.

Los Angeles Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "nevertheless auspiciously for" in formal writing due to its awkward construction. Opt for clearer and more common alternatives to convey your intended meaning.

Common error

Don't combine "nevertheless" and "auspiciously for" directly. These terms create a grammatically unsound construction. Use alternatives like "nevertheless, fortunately" or rephrase for clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "nevertheless auspiciously for" attempts to combine a contrasting conjunction with an adverbial phrase indicating a positive beginning. Ludwig AI indicates this is an incorrect phrase. The phrase does not fulfill a standard grammatical function due to its awkward construction.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "nevertheless auspiciously for" is grammatically incorrect and not recommended for use. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. The intended meaning—acknowledging a contrast while highlighting a positive outcome—is better conveyed using alternative phrases such as "nevertheless, fortunately", "however favorably for", or by rephrasing the sentence entirely. Due to its lack of clear meaning and infrequent usage, it's best to avoid this phrase in both formal and informal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

nevertheless favorably for

Replaces "auspiciously" with a more direct synonym, "favorably", to indicate a positive outcome despite a contrasting element.

however auspiciously for

Substitutes "nevertheless" with "however" to maintain the contrasting element while keeping "auspiciously" for a positive connotation.

yet auspiciously for

Uses "yet" as a simpler alternative to "nevertheless", highlighting the contrast while retaining the positive aspect with "auspiciously".

despite this auspiciously for

Emphasizes the contrast using "despite this" followed by the positive "auspiciously", creating a clearer structure.

in spite of this auspiciously for

Similar to "despite this", this alternative highlights the contrast more explicitly while keeping the positive connotation.

nonetheless auspiciously for

Replaces "nevertheless" with "nonetheless", offering a synonym that maintains a formal tone, followed by "auspiciously".

even so auspiciously for

Uses "even so" to introduce a contrasting element, keeping "auspiciously" to indicate a positive result.

but auspiciously for

A simpler and more direct contrast using "but", followed by the positive aspect with "auspiciously".

still auspiciously for

Employs "still" to indicate a continuing positive situation despite a preceding contrast, using "auspiciously".

that being said auspiciously for

Introduces a contrasting statement using "that being said", then follows with the positive "auspiciously".

FAQs

Is "nevertheless auspiciously for" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "nevertheless auspiciously for" is not grammatically correct and is considered awkward. It's best to use more common and clear alternatives.

What are some alternatives to "nevertheless auspiciously for"?

You can use alternatives like "nevertheless fortunately", "however favorably for", or rephrase the sentence for clarity.

How can I use "nevertheless" and "auspiciously" in the same sentence correctly?

While not directly combined, you could say something like, "The project faced challenges; nevertheless, it began "auspiciously"."

Why is "nevertheless auspiciously for" considered an incorrect phrase?

The combination of "nevertheless" (indicating contrast) directly with "auspiciously for" (indicating a favorable start) creates a grammatically awkward and unclear construction. It's better to separate them or use synonyms for better flow.