The word 'neutralization' is correct and usable in written English.
It refers to the process of making something neutral or less extreme, or the act of neutralizing or counteracting something. Here is an example of how the word 'neutralization' can be used in a sentence: The company implemented a new policy aimed at preventing conflicts of interest and ensuring the neutralization of any potential biases among its employees.
This type of reaction is called neutralization, because the solution is made neutral.
(2) Neutralization tests, which depend on the capacity of antibody to neutralize the infectious properties of the infectious organisms.
A recent piece by D. W. Haslett (2002) also conceives of affirmative action as a way to neutralize "tainted" advantages enjoyed by whites, although he concedes that the neutralization is "extremely rough" (83).
From the early 1920s until the rise of Nazi Germany in the 1930s, the Balkan states enjoyed a large degree of freedom from foreign influence and interference, owing to the disappearance of the Habsburg and Russian empires and the neutralization of the Dardanelles.
The Franco-German War took the government completely by surprise, and the Cabinet would not allow Gladstone to propose to Prussia the neutralization of Alsace and Lorraine.
It can also be precipitated by acidification (to remove carbon dioxide) and then neutralization (to remove the uranium) or by reduction to less soluble tetravalent uranium.
First, suppose we insist that counterfactual levels of effort are simply irrelevant to luck-neutralization: ex hypothesi, one's actual levels of effort are not a matter of luck, and a luck-neutralizing distribution should fit the distribution of actual efforts.
And the fact that there is room for these different readings encourages us to ask exactly what role luck-neutralization can play in relation to a theory of distributive justice.
In any case, luck-egalitarians are unlikely to claim that luck-neutralization is the only ideal, as that would imply that a world where everyone lives miserable lives is better, all things considered, than a world where half the people live tremendous lives and the other half live even better lives.
Many passages in the luck egalitarian literature suggest that justice is luck-neutralization, not luck-amplification, not luck-mitigation (Mason 2006), and not luck-equalization.
Addressing this question, Susan Hurley distinguishes between a specificatory and a justificatory role for the aim of luck-neutralization.
