Sentence examples for neutral outcomes from inspiring English sources

Surprisingly, we observed identical overall activation levels in the empathy network during the presentation of information about harmful and neutral outcomes.

The outcome-by-judgment interaction effect was observed in (a) a mixed-design and (b) a within-subjects design such that the difference in ratings for negative versus neutral outcomes was greater for punishment judgments as compared to wrongness judgments.

As hypothesized, the mixed-effects regression on PSC in the empathy network during the judgment phase showed that moral condemnation was predicted by activity in the empathy network, more so far harmful outcomes than neutral outcomes (PSC × outcome: estimate = 0.1959, se = 0.0628, df = 2947.94, t = 3.1188, p = 0.0018).

Though neutral outcomes on child welfare indicators may bring into question FGDM's efficacy for changing child welfare outcomes, this study confirms previous findings with smaller sample sizes on the impact of FGDM and demonstrates a methodological improvement over individual or family-case analyses.

Novel variants of the "weather prediction" task were created, in which cue cards predicted either looming fearful or neutral outcomes in a between-groups design.

METHODS:Medication-naïve children 4 to 6 years old (N = 52) participated in a study using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess neural reactivity to reward, including gain, loss, and neutral outcomes.

Participants read vignettes in a 2 × 2 × 2 design: protagonists produced either a negative or neutral outcome, based on the belief that they were causing the negative outcome or the neutral outcome; presentation of belief information either preceded or followed outcome information.

For instance, a person might put a white powder they believe to be sugar (neutral intent) or poison (harmful intent) into a potential victim's coffee, and the powder might be sugar (neutral outcome) or poison, causing the victim to die (harmful outcome).

Additionally, this pattern of response should hold only for negative outcome conditions where a victim is harmed (accidental and intentional harms, i.e.) and not for neutral outcome conditions where no salient information about harm is present (neutral and attempted harms, i.e.e.e

Neutral outcome ranked next and negative outcome ranked the least".

"This largely neutral outcome is far better than some expectations of significant cuts and it likely removes at least some of the pricing concern that has held these stocks in check," the analyst said.