Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Ground-truth communities of large networks were not available to researchers until Yang and Leskovec [1] defined ground-truth communities (as found in SNAP1) for several real-world large networks, including several social networks, paper coauthorship networks, and product copurchase networks.
Similar(59)
This assumption was first introduced in [25] and has been subsequently used in many recent networks papers (see, e.g., [9, 11, 12, 16]).
We used these to benchmark and rank journals containing the NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks papers.
The 390 NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks papers were distributed across 41 distinct field categories, reflecting a wide range of disciplines, although more than 36% (15) of the fields included only a single publication.
In an effort to examine the variation in presence, performance, and impact of NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks papers in relation to a wide variety of scientific areas of study we conducted an analysis of bibliometric indicators by fields (i.e. ISI's Current Content Categories).
Table 1 Review of papers in CLL network Paper Problem Obj.
We have added references to our original FI network paper in the paragraph introducing "Network analysis features".
Contingency Planning and Humanitarian Action - A Review of Practice, ODI Humanitarian Practice Network, 2007 This Network Paper explores the current process practice of contingency planning in humanitarian organisations.
Communication network papers which use simulators (such as OPNET, OMNET++, Matlab, custom simulators in programming languages etc).
We also separately selected to review 19 sociocentric network papers (arising from 10 other studies) on development topics related to wellbeing in LMICs.
First, to provide a methodological resource, we discuss the sociocentric network study designs employed in the selected papers, and then provide a catalog of 105 name generator questions used to measure social ties across all the LMIC network papers (including both ego- and sociocentric network papers) cited in this review.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com