Sentence examples for negligible decrease in from inspiring English sources
As shown in Fig. 4b, negligible decrease in PL intensity is observed after 20 consecutive switching cycles.
In addition, photocatalyst reusability studies were conducted and found that Eu-doped catalyst could be reused several times with negligible decrease in catalytic activity.
Low temperature heat treatment (230 °C for 2 h) caused a considerable increase in the surface hardness with negligible decrease in the corrosion resistance.
The ultrathin V2O5 shows a very high capacitance of 510 F g−1 and possesses excellent cyclic stability with negligible decrease in specific capacitance after 5000 cycles.
Our numerical results indicate that for cases with high patient demand and high patient no-show rates for fixed appointments, one or more Pareto optimal percentages of open appointments significantly decrease the variability in the number of patients seen with only a negligible decrease in the expected number of patients seen.
The CoSe2 NS@CP electrode showed both excellent catalytic activity with overall current density of 100 mA cm−2 at 2.13 V and tremendous durability with negligible decrease in potential at a constant current of 20 mA cm−2 for more than 30 hours.
It is rather remarkable that the PSSs exhibit excellent hydrothermal stability as demonstrated by the fact that after 1 week of boiling water treatment, negligible decreases in surface area and pore volume were observed (Supplementary Table 1).
HD composites, the only ones actually designed to be directly exposed to rainfall, exhibited almost negligible decreases in mechanical properties and hence a substantially satisfactory behavior.
Controls were run without enzyme or without substrate and showed negligible decreases in absorbance at 300 nm.
A larger study of 168 mRCC patients who received targeted therapy with their primary tumors in situ found noted negligible decreases in the size of the primary tumors [ 25].
The intervention led to a negligible decrease of 0.49% in CVR (95% CI [−1.43; 0.45], p = 0.308) in the intervention group compared to the control group.
