Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
Three different computer visuospatial neglect tests were administered: the Neglect and Visual Scanning subtests of the Test Battery for Attention Performance TAP 2.1 [ 23] and the Extinction-Neglect (Spatial Attention) subtest of the Test Battery for Perception and Attention Functions (WAF) [ 24] of the Vienna Test System.
Results: On day 30, postural and neglect tests improved significantly more in DG than in CG.
and b) had scores indicative of spatial neglect in at least two of three formal neglect tests.
Patients were assessed with a battery of standardized neglect tests, as well as with tests of working memory, selective and sustained attention and motor function.
Comparisons of the neglect tests concerning omissions as well as reaction time and of the alertness test yielded no significant differences between depressive patients and healthy controls.
The leftward bias in control subjects observed in two of the three neglect tests may reflect a phenomenon termed pseudoneglect, originally investigated in line bisection tasks and inducing a leftward bias in neurologically healthy subjects.
Similar(52)
The Neglect Test (NET, [ 43]; adapted German version of the Behavioural Inattention Test – BIT, [ 44] was used as a standardized neuropsychological neglect test-battery for diagnosing neglect in the patient group and for ruling out neglect in the patient control group.
However, these approaches mainly focus on security requirements elicitation, analysis and design issues and neglect testing.
Main Outcome Measures: Patients were assessed on days 0, 30, and 90 by using a battery of postural tests, gait evaluation, the Bells neglect test, and the FIM™ instrument.
Behaviourally, OKS caused both a short- and a long-term (4 weeks) improvement of performance in a neglect test battery (compared to a 3-week baseline period).
N. G. developed the neglect test that was adapted for Eye-Search.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com