negative repercussion for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "negative repercussion for" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe the potential consequences or results that may arise from a certain action or decision. Here is an example: "The company's decision to cut costs had a negative repercussion for their employees, who were forced to take pay cuts and reduced benefits."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Both sides say that whatever the outcome, the tough bargaining may ultimately drive them further apart, with negative repercussion for a diplomatic relationship that is already strained.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Reports of negative repercussions for requesting mental health treatment are rampant in the armed forces.

The New York Times

She worries that dishonest requests for service or support animals will have negative repercussions for people who really need them.

The New York Times

"Limiting its use will have negative repercussions for consumers and home values up and down the housing chain".

The New York Times

Beware letting things like this go by as if they don't matter; they can have negative repercussions for years to come.

The New York Times

The perception that Kuwait's relative democracy hinders its economic development has negative repercussions for the perceptions of democracy in the Gulf region.

The Guardian

The current trend, he warned, would have "very negative repercussions" for a range of Swiss companies and would endanger "thousands and thousands of jobs".

The New York Times

British aid in India, said Ms. Seery of Oxfam, has a "real and significant impact," and its withdrawal could have significant negative repercussions for its poorest.

The New York Times

I did not report the incident, fearing that such an action might have regrettable negative repercussions for the driver, as for me as the "witness," if these New Jersey troopers learned that formal complaints had been made against them.

The New York Times

"If this Boston case had happened 10 or 12 years ago, it might have had some negative repercussions" for the national movement to force a cleanup of the clergy, he said.

The New York Times

When Tillerson prevailed in reinstating some of the humanitarian funds for U.N.R.W.A. that Haley had sought to withhold, press items discussing potential negative repercussions for Kushner's Middle East peace efforts began appearing.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "negative repercussion for", ensure that the context clearly establishes the cause-and-effect relationship. State explicitly what action or event is leading to the negative consequence.

Common error

While grammatically correct, "negative repercussion for" can sound overly formal in casual conversation. Opt for simpler alternatives like "bad effect on" or "negative impact on" to maintain a natural tone in informal settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "negative repercussion for" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or verb, indicating a causal relationship where the action or event described by the modified word has an unfavorable outcome for someone or something. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's correctness.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

30%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "negative repercussion for" is a grammatically sound phrase used to denote adverse consequences stemming from a specific action or event. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct, although its occurrence is relatively rare. While suitable for professional and analytical contexts, simpler alternatives might be preferable in casual settings. This phrase is most commonly found in news articles, scientific research, and formal business communications, serving the purpose of cautioning, critiquing, or analyzing potential unfavorable outcomes. While grammatically valid and understood, writers may want to consider stronger, more direct alternatives for impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

negative impact on

More direct synonym, impact replaces repercussion, simple change in wording.

adverse impact on

Synonymous with negative impact, but could be perceived as slightly more formal.

adverse consequence for

Replaces "repercussion" with a more general term for consequence and maintains the negative connotation.

damaging effect on

Highlights the destructive nature of the effect.

detrimental effect on

Focuses on the damaging aspect of the outcome, shifting from a consequence to an effect.

harmful impact on

Highlights the damaging impact, emphasizing the potential for harm.

ill effect on

Emphasizes the negative or unhealthy nature of the result.

unfavorable outcome for

Shifts the focus to the result being undesirable or not advantageous.

poor result for

A more simplified way of saying a negative outcome.

downside for

Highlights the disadvantage of something.

FAQs

How to use "negative repercussion for" in a sentence?

Use "negative repercussion for" to describe an adverse consequence resulting from a specific action or situation. For example, "The budget cuts had a "negative repercussion for" the education sector".

What can I say instead of "negative repercussion for"?

You can use alternatives like "adverse consequence for", "detrimental effect on", or "harmful impact on" depending on the context.

Is "negative repercussion for" too formal for casual conversation?

Yes, "negative repercussion for" can sound overly formal in casual conversation. In such contexts, consider using simpler alternatives like "bad effect on" or "negative impact on".

What's the difference between "negative repercussion for" and "negative impact on"?

While similar, "negative repercussion for" implies a more indirect or cascading effect, whereas "negative impact on" suggests a more direct and immediate consequence.